I have personally argued the case FOR disestablishment over several years - and, sadly, have fallen foul of some of my local clergy as a result - My case is based on the fact that in 1987 the Church of England "lost" some �850m on ill-advised investments. This was money donated by church members over many years but is now lost for all time, and the books were never examined as to the causes for the loss. My second point concerns the 1701 Act of Succession which clearly discriminates against Roman Catholics, despite the fact that they may be Christian themselves, in that those members of the Royal Family, who would otherwise be in line to succeed to the throne, are debarred from marrying a Roman Catholic - a rule laid down in terms of the constitution which facilitated the whim of Henry VIII. My third point concerns the fact that the Archbishop of Canterbury is selected for appointment by those members of the House of Lords, some of whom may not even be of any religious faith.
I have other issues too which so far remain unanswered by the authorities but on which history may well judge. And that concerns the truth behind the detaining of Terry Waite in 1987 as a hostage in the Lebanon. Terry Waite was employed as special envoy to the Archbishop of Canterbury at the time (Dr. Robert Runcie) and it has been suggested that there may have been contact with the Israelis concerning some hitherto "unexplained issues".