ChatterBank0 min ago
Obamas Nobel peace prize
25 Answers
Should Barak Obama have been given the Nobel Peace prize so soon?
Or should the comittee have waited a few years?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8298580.stm
Or should the comittee have waited a few years?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8298580.stm
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jake-the-peg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.yes, it's customary to award prizes to someone who's actually done something (I'm trying not to think about Kissinger for the moment). Carter got his for his post-presidential work, which has been considerable (in fact he's probably had more effect on the world at large than any other former president), and Gore for his work on climate change, ditto. But Obama.... uh, what?
I was quite surprised when I heard it on the news. Normally scientists don't get a prize until after a lifetime of achievement and it has been justified in practice. Up till now Obama has achieved little although his intentions are good. This rushed decision may turn round and haunt the committee for years to come. Maybe because its a US president they are not able to give postumus awards knowing the history and demise of those in the post.
-- answer removed --
According to their web site Barak Obama was awarded the prize, for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples???????????????
I agree with others, how can he be given the Nobel Peace Prize, when he is considering sending more of his troops into Afghanistan, and has been on the telephone to Brown about increasing our force out there.
Now if as Gromit said started some action to solve the israel/Palestine conflict.
Or withdrawn his troops from Afghanistan.
Or reduced by a considerable amount America's nuclear weapons.
Or lifted sanctions against Cuba.
Or improved relations with North Korea.
Or stopped sabre rattling against Iran.
Then, and only then would he be a touch nearer to being on the short list for the award.
I agree with others, how can he be given the Nobel Peace Prize, when he is considering sending more of his troops into Afghanistan, and has been on the telephone to Brown about increasing our force out there.
Now if as Gromit said started some action to solve the israel/Palestine conflict.
Or withdrawn his troops from Afghanistan.
Or reduced by a considerable amount America's nuclear weapons.
Or lifted sanctions against Cuba.
Or improved relations with North Korea.
Or stopped sabre rattling against Iran.
Then, and only then would he be a touch nearer to being on the short list for the award.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.