Donate SIGN UP

So we can't even decide who we can let in now!

Avatar Image
R1Geezer | 14:22 Tue 13th Oct 2009 | News
18 Answers
Would you accept it if your neighbours could force you to let in someone you don't like? Looks like we've signed up for similar!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/8304926.stm
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal is a part of the British Government. It is there to make sure the Government of the day correctly applies the British Law (and does not ban some one on the hoof). It is a there to act as a check, and make sure the Government does not abuse iots position.

http://www.ait.gov.uk/

This is purely a British matter. There is no foreign or EU involvement in this process. Who are the neighbours you think are forcing us to accept this man into our country?
Question Author
ok, hands up Gromit, I just assumed it was an EU body, fair cop!

Anyway should we let the chap in do you think?
He is a publicity seeker and his presence here is likely to be met by protests which will cost us to police.

On the other hand, he is free to hold his views, and there are those who want to hear him.

Hard call, but I would keep him out because I don't think he has much to contribute which could not be done via his bizarre YouTube film.
Probably but with a close eye - he's still subject to UK law and if he falls foul of Inciting racial hatred we should just kick him out.

Not prosecute him - he'd love that!

I note he was invited by UKIP one of who's MEPs recently said referring to someone a P@ki was no different to referring to someone as a Brummie.

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/opinion/Arun-Arora-Why-this-dancer.5723795.jp

Nice! I wonder what Mr Bloom MEP thinks of calling people n166ers? Perhaps the same as referring to someone as a scouser?

The more I learn about UKIP the less I like them
-- answer removed --
"Slap a ban on the media being allowed to interview him..."

What a concept - fight fascism with fascism!
-- answer removed --
We tried to ban Sinn Fein being reported once. It didn't work.

Do you remember the BBC getting actors to read their words, as the BBC were not allowed to play the original recordings?
We should let him in and he should be plied with booze, then interviewed on News At Ten. That'll stop people talking about What Anton and Dannii said.
-- answer removed --
As our laws now say ethnic minorities must be allowed to join the BNP then this speaker should ask for and be allowed to speak in a mosque.
I didn't moan - I was laughing at the irony that you did not recognise in your own statement.
...and exactly what solution is required?

Let him in.
Let him have his say.
Right-minded people will recognise him for what he is - others will not. Ces't la vie.
He will go home.
-- answer removed --
rov1200

Where did you read that?

Is that really true?

How fantastic...

If it's true, I'm going to get all my mates (black and Asian) to join up, and attend their meetings.

Might get load of my gay friends to join up too...especially the really camp ones.

It'll be hilarious.
Seems like just another case of don't let anyone upset the Muslims.

There are laws in place which can be put into action if this person acts in any way that breaks the law.

It seems odd that the Government can ban anyone in this country that they disapprove of, yet on the other hand invite some of the Worlds most hated despots to pay State visits.

They even knighted one.
Cold weather today, All Europe's falt innit ?
"where racial tensions are currently running high thanks to the activities of the EDL and UAF"... and of course, AOG :-)

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Do you know the answer?

So we can't even decide who we can let in now!

Answer Question >>