Blair's babes versus Cameron's cuties.

123everton | 09:06 Sun 01st Nov 2009 | News

6 Answers

Is it right that after something like a hundred years of suffrage, and somewhat less of universal suffrage, that in the twenty first century the media should seek to rate (presumably) inteligent women on their fitness to look at, rather than their fitness to govern?

Was the US wise to place this ban?

False rape sentence

Answers

1 to 6 of 6

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by 123everton. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

anotheoldgit

A link would have been useful but, it is not just women or politicians.

In this age of media image and presentation, that is all that seems to matter.

Cameron v Ken Clarke, Blair v Brown, Menzies Campbell v Nick Clegg.

-- answer removed --

jno

It is annoying and too Sunnish. On the other hand, I rather wish more of Blair's babes had indeed proved fit to govern... but you could say the same about a lot of the males.

123everton

Question Author

That's exactly the point JNO, nobody ever says "he's a useless orator, a worthless but he's got a nice arse and good taste in shoes."
Look at Ann Widdecombe, I don't agree with much of what she stands for but at least she stands for something, she wouldn't get a look in now.

123everton

Question Author

Should read "worthless legislator"