News0 min ago
body scanners, do we have any privacy ?
Answers
All your basic rights are being removed as 'not important' in today's world. And it seems folk are happy to see it happen.
Here is a case of no dignity nor respect for the individual, in the hunt for appearing to be trying for perfect safety. The fact that it isn't going to stop any determined terrorist seems to have passed the authorities by.
11:57 Wed 03rd Mar 2010
Mibs, yes indeed. I was very tempted to make the same point - and you're right, so I won't hold my breath. Thank you for that.
Old Geezer, //It reads to me that Mani was just putting his feelings in such a way that their point could not be missed.//
The real point of Mani's post can only be missed by those who don't know him or his history. Nevertheless, since you clearly deem his rudeness to be acceptable I can only conclude that you are as ignorant and as ill-mannered as he is.
Old Geezer, //It reads to me that Mani was just putting his feelings in such a way that their point could not be missed.//
The real point of Mani's post can only be missed by those who don't know him or his history. Nevertheless, since you clearly deem his rudeness to be acceptable I can only conclude that you are as ignorant and as ill-mannered as he is.
I don't have any information on folk's history here, I just help where I can, and point out the obvious where it seems to need pointing out.
Since I don't see any evidence of Mani being rude here I can not possibly be finding his rudeness acceptable.
However what is very rude is to conclude that I, or anyone else, is ignorant without cause, and to claim I am ill mannered. I defy anyone to show any point at which there is evidence of this.
Feel free to print an apology in your own time. I won't hold my breath.
Since I don't see any evidence of Mani being rude here I can not possibly be finding his rudeness acceptable.
However what is very rude is to conclude that I, or anyone else, is ignorant without cause, and to claim I am ill mannered. I defy anyone to show any point at which there is evidence of this.
Feel free to print an apology in your own time. I won't hold my breath.
On top of calling me ignorant and ill mannered you now question my standards ? Digging deeper & deeper eh ?
If you claim to support showing your intimate areas to those with scanners then it can't be rude to suggest you *may* be used to it. It follows naturally, and points out what the disagreement is in no uncertain terms.
Yes Sqad, you do seem to be suggesting you have missed the point. It is about having no choice as to whether one's own genitals are shown not a general point as to whether folk now what genitals look like, but my suspicion is that you knew that.
If folk do not have this right then why does society prosecute "peeping Toms" ? Maybe the suggestion is that anyone should be able to demand another exposes themselves whether they like it or not ? Perhaps I'll go down to the Typing Pool later and try it.
If you claim to support showing your intimate areas to those with scanners then it can't be rude to suggest you *may* be used to it. It follows naturally, and points out what the disagreement is in no uncertain terms.
Yes Sqad, you do seem to be suggesting you have missed the point. It is about having no choice as to whether one's own genitals are shown not a general point as to whether folk now what genitals look like, but my suspicion is that you knew that.
If folk do not have this right then why does society prosecute "peeping Toms" ? Maybe the suggestion is that anyone should be able to demand another exposes themselves whether they like it or not ? Perhaps I'll go down to the Typing Pool later and try it.
-- answer removed --