Other Sports12 mins ago
Subject to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974.
14 Answers
Subject to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, have you ever been fined, imprisoned, placed on probation, discharged on payment of costs or had any order made against you by YES NO a Criminal, Civil or Military Court?
Does this mean you have to disclose spent criminal convictions?
Does this mean you have to disclose spent criminal convictions?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bigfoot3000. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.No, it means you DON'T have to.
The form is saying "we require you to provide this information but we recognise that, under the provisions of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, you're not required to disclosed 'spent' convictions".
Irrespective of what it might say on any form, you're never required to disclose spent convictions other than in relation to those types of employment which are exempted from the provisions of the Act. (They're principally jobs working with, or alongside, children or vulnerable adults. Employment related to the 'administration of justice' is also exempted).
In relation to the type of questions you're referred to, the Act states that you may lawfully 'answer accordingly' (i.e. lie). 'Ancillary matters' are also covered by the Act. If, for example, you were refused insurance solely because of an unspent criminal conviction you could later (when that conviction became spent) lawfully answer 'No' if you were asked "Have you ever been refused insurance?"
Chris
The form is saying "we require you to provide this information but we recognise that, under the provisions of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, you're not required to disclosed 'spent' convictions".
Irrespective of what it might say on any form, you're never required to disclose spent convictions other than in relation to those types of employment which are exempted from the provisions of the Act. (They're principally jobs working with, or alongside, children or vulnerable adults. Employment related to the 'administration of justice' is also exempted).
In relation to the type of questions you're referred to, the Act states that you may lawfully 'answer accordingly' (i.e. lie). 'Ancillary matters' are also covered by the Act. If, for example, you were refused insurance solely because of an unspent criminal conviction you could later (when that conviction became spent) lawfully answer 'No' if you were asked "Have you ever been refused insurance?"
Chris
http://www.yourrights...s/excluded-sentences.
,it's certain types of convictions you have to declare
,it's certain types of convictions you have to declare
Jobs with security companies are not exempted from the provision of the RoOA. So applicants are not directly required to declare any spent convictions on their application forms - but see below. However such companies usually require a 10 year checkable work history. (i.e. you've effectively got to prove that you weren't in prison, anywhere in the world, at any time in the past 10 years).
Further, jobs which require an SIA licence need a CRB check in order to obtain that licence. CRB checks show all convictions, including spent ones:
http://www.sia.homeof.../Pages/licensing.aspx
Chris
Further, jobs which require an SIA licence need a CRB check in order to obtain that licence. CRB checks show all convictions, including spent ones:
http://www.sia.homeof.../Pages/licensing.aspx
Chris
JUst:
It's not the type of conviction which is relevant. It's the type of employment which is being applied for.
All convictions (except those resulting in a prison sentence of over 2½ years) eventually become 'spent' for all purposes except those exempted from the provisions of the Act. (It doesn't matter whether the conviction was for dishonesty or for violence or a sexual offence).
Similarly all convictions are never regarded as spent when applying for those types of employment which are exempted from the provisions of the Act.
It's not the type of conviction which is relevant. It's the type of employment which is being applied for.
All convictions (except those resulting in a prison sentence of over 2½ years) eventually become 'spent' for all purposes except those exempted from the provisions of the Act. (It doesn't matter whether the conviction was for dishonesty or for violence or a sexual offence).
Similarly all convictions are never regarded as spent when applying for those types of employment which are exempted from the provisions of the Act.
That link shows a '404' error code on my screen.
This link show information derived from the National Association for the Care and Rehabilitation of Offenders:
http://www.lawontheweb.co.uk/rehabact.htm
This link show information derived from the National Association for the Care and Rehabilitation of Offenders:
http://www.lawontheweb.co.uk/rehabact.htm
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.