Question Author
naomi24
/// but there are plenty of people out there of all ages who shouldn't be left in charge of their own children, so it's a non-argument.///
One can always use this excuse, "there are plenty of people who should not be in charge of children"
Just as you could say to a person with only one leg "it could be worse you could have no legs"
No the fact of this particular case, was the fact that two16 year olds, were allowed to take charge of their own infant, which resulted in the infants death.
Surely the fact that they were so young and the father said to be mentally backward, should have set off alarm bells.
All this talk about "all sixteen year olds are not the same" and jake asks me why I haven't played the race card, I despair at the mentality of some of you "plus sixteen year olds".