Business & Finance3 mins ago
Why put on a special party for a group of people just because they are Gay?
66 Answers
http://tinyurl.com/2vyc84a
It would appear one has to belong to a minority group in this country, before one gets any recognition.
If the Government of the land find a need to put on special parties at No.10, why not put them on for people who have achieved something good for their country, instead of a group of people who's only achievement is their particular sexual preferences.
It would appear one has to belong to a minority group in this country, before one gets any recognition.
If the Government of the land find a need to put on special parties at No.10, why not put them on for people who have achieved something good for their country, instead of a group of people who's only achievement is their particular sexual preferences.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I find myself unimpressed with any politician who feels the need to exhibit their so-called 'cool credentials' to the meida, and thus to the electorate.
From my experience, gay people are not stupid. they know that the Tory party has a lamentable history of homophobia and reactionary views, and are unlikely to be impressed by this media-friendly sop which, if i were gay I would find deeply insulting,
Mr Cameron would do better by providing an encompassing attitude, and not simply cherry-picking sections of soceity and insulting them by thinking he can woo their votes by giving jelly and ice-cream to prominent individuals who'se only common link is an aspect of sexuality.
I never thought I'd say it, but I entirely agree with AOG!
From my experience, gay people are not stupid. they know that the Tory party has a lamentable history of homophobia and reactionary views, and are unlikely to be impressed by this media-friendly sop which, if i were gay I would find deeply insulting,
Mr Cameron would do better by providing an encompassing attitude, and not simply cherry-picking sections of soceity and insulting them by thinking he can woo their votes by giving jelly and ice-cream to prominent individuals who'se only common link is an aspect of sexuality.
I never thought I'd say it, but I entirely agree with AOG!
-- answer removed --
Only achievement? So then AOG - these are all under achievers eh? Nuryev, Nijinsky, Oscar Wilde,Michelangelo, Leonard Bernstein, Terence Rattigan, Gielgud, Guinness, Redgrave, Errol Flynn, Josephine Baker, Elton John, Dusty Springfield, Virginia Woolfe, Noel Coward, Michael Tippett, Navratilova, Fashanu, Saint-Seans, Cecil Beaton, E M Forster, Tennessee Williams, Tchaikovsky........
May one ask what your achievement is then - I know you are already a minority group.
Have you ever considered going to one of the Queen's garden parties?
May one ask what your achievement is then - I know you are already a minority group.
Have you ever considered going to one of the Queen's garden parties?
ttfn - i don't think AOG is making the point that gay people are non-achievers, rather that the apparent raison d'etre of this party is to entertain celebrities etc., purely on the basis that they are gay. AOG takes issue with the notion of inviting individuals purely on the basis of their orientation, and i think that's a valid point.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.