ChatterBank3 mins ago
Scarred for life... If he lives.
http://www.dailymail....arty-fights-life.html
It isn't just under-educated 'chavs' who commit horrific crimes as some posters on AB would have us believe.
What on earth would make anyone think this was ok to do? Is this sort of behaviour reinforced by TV programmes such as Trigger Happy TV and ***?
I've never been one to claim that TV or films are to blame for this sort of thing but i'm now beginning to wonder.
It isn't just under-educated 'chavs' who commit horrific crimes as some posters on AB would have us believe.
What on earth would make anyone think this was ok to do? Is this sort of behaviour reinforced by TV programmes such as Trigger Happy TV and ***?
I've never been one to claim that TV or films are to blame for this sort of thing but i'm now beginning to wonder.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by daffy654. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It's got nothing to do with films or games it's a bunch of pi55ed up students being stupid. Propbably thought It'd be a laugh and I didn't imagine the consequences. No excuses but sh1t happens when you have house full of rat ar5ed teens. This bloke just happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. The purpetrators have been charged with GBH so that's their lives tainted for good, I doubt it was premeditated just a prank where the pranksters did not forsee the full effects.
Nothing to do with TV or games or anything like that. Students are off the parental leash for the first time, and egg each other on to do the most stupid things sometimes. It's that awkward transitional time when they seem to be able to do 'anything' and have yet to develop the self control not to. Especially under peer pressure.
I agree with geezer, it doesn't sound malicious. They probably had a mental picture of the guy jumping up and running around the room flapping his arms with a cartoonish cloud of smoke coming from the seat of his pants, after which everyone would have a good laugh including the victim himself.
Unfortunately they've potentially runied someone's life, so they should have to pay for that stupidity.
Unfortunately they've potentially runied someone's life, so they should have to pay for that stupidity.
yes that's true so what do you expect us to do now, I don't get the point you are making or what you expect to happen here. Are you just saying please everyone agree with me and we can move on? Tell me you've never done anything stupid whilst young and out of it. I've done stupid things that could have ended in death or injury but I was lucky, I suspect pretty well everyone has, most of the time you get away with it, this time the purpetrators/victim didn't. I can remember wheelieing my GT380 down Holdenhurst rd whilst ratted. I could have crashed, injured or killed someone or myself and someone like you would be saying "who in the right mind would think that was a good idea?" No one and I wasn't in my "Right mind" when I'd sobered up in the morning I'd have agreed with you!
I'm not trying to be pedantic, but the perpertrators were 20 and 21 years old, so not teens.
I have seen many of the videos where idiots do daft things like setting someone's seat of the jeans on fire. In those videos the 'victim' is usually complicit in the act. In this case the victim was asleep and in no way complicit. I recently heard of a strange game that has been banned in may schools in Australia after one young boy had to have a testicle amputated because of it. (google 'sack tapping'). All of these so called pranks and games seem to have evolved from some of the daft stunts you see on jacka$$.... I even know a group of young blokes who do these sorts of things... but never involving alcohol and naked flames.
I would have thought anyone intelligent enough to be at uni would know that setting light to a friend after you doused him in rum was going to cause injury.
I have seen many of the videos where idiots do daft things like setting someone's seat of the jeans on fire. In those videos the 'victim' is usually complicit in the act. In this case the victim was asleep and in no way complicit. I recently heard of a strange game that has been banned in may schools in Australia after one young boy had to have a testicle amputated because of it. (google 'sack tapping'). All of these so called pranks and games seem to have evolved from some of the daft stunts you see on jacka$$.... I even know a group of young blokes who do these sorts of things... but never involving alcohol and naked flames.
I would have thought anyone intelligent enough to be at uni would know that setting light to a friend after you doused him in rum was going to cause injury.