Donate SIGN UP

Can anyone work out why the Daily Mail felt it necessary to shine the spotlight on this WPC???

Avatar Image
sp1814 | 14:03 Mon 02nd Aug 2010 | News
35 Answers
Is this just the DM being a bit nasty? Or is there a genuine public interest angle on this story:

http://www.dailymail....WPC-used-PC-beat.html

Or perhaps it's just a slow news day, so to fill their pages, they feel at liberty taking a personal story and splashing it so that this police officer can be gossiped about by a wider audience?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 35 of 35rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Oh, come on, all this fake outrage and sham sensitivity - pick up the vast majority of rags and you'll find so called "nasty" stories. It's nothing new. It's like watching the telly, if you don't like it don't watch it - or in this case, don't read it.

I'm not sticking up for the likes of the Daily Mail, but so many people *** off the tabloids, yet still see fit to read them first. Why bother? If you dislike or even hate the rag in question, why even feel the need to give it even more publicity via sites like this if you so say abhor it in the first place? Where's the logic? Or the justification?

All this self righteous indignation and wringing of hands over some poxy story about a confused person is so false as to be laughable and pathetic - as the modern saying goes: "grow some!"(no pun!)
The word deemed so nasty as to be starred out is s-lag.
I dont think that he - sorry she , has thought this out carefully .

What happens when she begins to loose her hair ?

No doubt she will be off on sick leave . citing psychological reasons
It is tacky journalism.

What is the point in intruding on this ladies life? Do we all feel safer knowing the details of her life?

Life is hard enough without the likes of the Daily Mail making things worse.

Susan
☞☞☞ a Daily Mail reader ☺☺☺
"titillation is important to some people, including me"
Shouldn't that read: "titillation, regardless of how it affects the privacy and dignity of others, is important to some people, including me"
How can this person be called a woman when she is still actually technically a man?
rojash......exactly and you have described accurately a definition of humour.
"exactly and you have described accurately a definition of humour"

Shouldn't that read "exactly and you have described accurately a definition Squad's sense of humour"?
I dont want to be crude about this , but does he have to have his tod*er removed ?
Dodgy make up, nice hair though
the daily mail always has to di g the dirt

the dm is just totally the lowest of the scummy gutter press.

written by miserable people

read by miserable people

grumble grumble grumble, blahdy blahdy blah !!

the daily mail is just a total raggy tabloid.
JJ

Over 2,000,000 people buy the Daily Mail daily.

Surely they are not all miserable people.
They are after reading it!
237SJ............yu have made your "laboured" point.

P.S I take the Daily Mail and the Daily Telegraph.
These things happen...it appears to have been handled reasonably well why make an issue of it...

21 to 35 of 35rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Can anyone work out why the Daily Mail felt it necessary to shine the spotlight on this WPC???

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.