I think there might have been a little more to it than that, Noth.
It is always encouraging for our legal system when people who have been fed a few snippets of the details of a trial by the newspapers feel able to arrive at a verdict far more satisfactorily than a jury, or magistrates can, having heard all the facts.
It is disappointing that Mr Fagan felt he had been the victim of racial discrimination. In a country where the vast majority of the population is white and where juries are chosen at random, there is always the possibility that an all white jury will be formed. Because such a jury convicts a black man, it does not mean that they have acted with discrimination.
Finally, Mr Fagan feels he has been convicted unfairly – “...with no evidence – no CCTV or anything.” Not many people are convicted with no evidence at all against them and Mr Fagan obviously suffers from the common misapprehension that the only form of evidence is CCTV.