Germany was bombed for longer and by more air forces than the UK was, so it'd be weird if they didn't have more tonnage of bombs... of course, the reason for it was because Germany entered into a war (and contrary to popular belief it seems to have done so did so by and large with the consent of its population) and also refused to surrender (perhaps less consensually). While it does sound callous, the German situation was of their own making.
I don't think that Jake's point is to undermine the Blitz, I think his point is just to show that the Germans displayed equal resilience, which is true. The resilience of both peoples against overwhelming odds are both examples of human courage and bloody-mindedness. Don't let the common perceptions of Nazi Germany fool you - the German people do seem to have been very supportive of their country's cause right up until near the end of the war.
Of course, the German situation was far, far more of their own making than was the British one. The German bombing was the result of a war that Germans, by and large, do seem to have been very supportive of when it was going well for them (and as I say above seem to have continued to do so until it was going diabolically for them). The British had been dragged into theirs kicking and screaming and had seriously contemplated not going through with it, but seem to have stuck with it anyway against highly uncertain odds.