Donate SIGN UP

Shouldn't Red Ed Wed?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 16:35 Tue 28th Sep 2010 | News
49 Answers
http://tinyurl.com/3ahugh4

Now that Ed Miliband is the new Labour Leader, and he says he is committed to the country and his party, shouldn't he now make a commitment to his partner, and marry her?

He also said he didn't have time to register the birth of his son, and the space on the birth certificate where the fathers name should be, remains blank.

I wonder if he will correct these things, now that his partner is expecting again, but wait a minute, now that he is Labour's Leader, isn't he going to be even more busy?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 49rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
AOG....don´t worry, he will wed, probably just before the next General Election.
As Sqad says, I expect he will before the next election, but really who cares? Labour have had their day.
-- answer removed --
Do you know AOG that his girlfriend wants to marry him, maybe they're happy as they are, and as for the birth certificate it's no-one's business but theirs.
naomi....early days. He is charismatic, nobody´s fool and if the Coalition don.t come up with the goods,the Lib Dems will be ditched and they will support Labour in a straight fight with the Tories.

Interesting times ahead...........don´t underestimate him....yet.
why should he? he's only reflecting what's happening across the nation with unwed families.
boxtops.....an unwed Prime Minister?.......I don´t think so.
If you're right, Sqad God(?) help us!! I know several people from former communist and socialist countries but I know none who would want the regimes back.
naomi...;-)
Edward Heath didn't have a wife, he did all right.
Why should they get married? If they don't want to then it is their choice.
He didn´t have any children either...........or a wife............or whatever?
I still don't see why he has to if he doesn't want to - and PM? - not yet.
couldn't care less, but the blank space on the birth certificate will frustrate any genealogically-minded descendants. Dotty should set him straight pronto.
Ted had many shirts and lifted them frequently.
McMouse.....aaargh!!!!!!! that is acceptable in Politics, some say desirable.........but a British PM living "over the brush?"..............not yet.
He will ditch his principles and marry.
His marital status is an irrelevance, except as a subject for gossip.Only if he and Labour assumed the moral high ground, preaching to the rest of us on relationship and parenting issues,or pontificating about "family values" a la John Major in the twighlight of his premiership. does it begin to have any legitimate political or social significance worthy of debate.
As I said before squad whether he marries or not depends not just on his wishes but on those of his girlfriend. If she doesn't want to marry him then it's all a bit of a non starter isn't it?
If Ed's son has got a birth certificate then the birth must have been registered. Leaving the father's name blank is odd, it's hardly a time thing. Maybe he isn't the father.
Lazygun.........you may well right, the British Public are odd in that superficially they accept these "anomalies" but when push comes to shove i.e a General Election, respectability and well trod traditional paths come to the fore.

A mistress.......fine..........but unmarried....questionable.

1 to 20 of 49rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Shouldn't Red Ed Wed?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.