Road rules2 mins ago
Swine flu.
34 Answers
http://tinyurl.com/3y3ajsy
/// Last year, of the 14million patients who were advised to have the swine flu jab, only around five million took up the offer.///.
This year’s flu jab will protect against three types of flu including H1N1 or swine flu. so patients who want to take up the flu jab offer will be given no choice, but to have the swine flu one also.
Is this ethical, or should patients be given a choice?
/// Last year, of the 14million patients who were advised to have the swine flu jab, only around five million took up the offer.///.
This year’s flu jab will protect against three types of flu including H1N1 or swine flu. so patients who want to take up the flu jab offer will be given no choice, but to have the swine flu one also.
Is this ethical, or should patients be given a choice?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
RATTER15
If anyone should be accused of being strange, then it is you who should head the list.
What is wrong in posting on a subject that some people feel strongly about.
Personally I have no objection to the all in one jab, but there will be many out there that want the usual flu jab, but not the swine flu one.
Just remember the Measles, mumps and rubella vaccine controversy.
If anyone should be accused of being strange, then it is you who should head the list.
What is wrong in posting on a subject that some people feel strongly about.
Personally I have no objection to the all in one jab, but there will be many out there that want the usual flu jab, but not the swine flu one.
Just remember the Measles, mumps and rubella vaccine controversy.
I thought the main problem was that when the initial panic started, there were not enough reserves of the vaccine to satisfy demand ?
Once it transpired that the doom-mongers had over-stated the epidemic people then failed to seek the vaccine in the projected numbers leaving a huge stockpile of paid for vaccine unused.
I think the research into the efficacy of the vaccine itself is sound.........it's the hoopla about the swine-flu epidemic that is unsound (and yes I do understand the problems in predicting infection, etc.).
Once it transpired that the doom-mongers had over-stated the epidemic people then failed to seek the vaccine in the projected numbers leaving a huge stockpile of paid for vaccine unused.
I think the research into the efficacy of the vaccine itself is sound.........it's the hoopla about the swine-flu epidemic that is unsound (and yes I do understand the problems in predicting infection, etc.).
AOG...you raise a very good point.
It is not a matter of whether you have the jab or not, it is a matter of whether or not you have the H1N1...................the " all or nothing" choice is, in my opinion unacceptable.
In my opinion, I still have doubts, however unreasonable, about the H1N1vaccine.
It is not a matter of whether you have the jab or not, it is a matter of whether or not you have the H1N1...................the " all or nothing" choice is, in my opinion unacceptable.
In my opinion, I still have doubts, however unreasonable, about the H1N1vaccine.
annie/ankou.........all side effects from H1N1 vaccinations are rare ( we think) although long term side effects cannot be assessed as the vaccine was given in 2009, too short a time to assess. Reactions can occur within 2-3 days, but theses are usually mild, but immediate type hypersensitivity reaction can be life threatening in the allergy predisposed patient.
Long term neurological disorders cannot be evaluated after only one year ( 2009 vaccine) although, I agree are rare.
My point and the point made by AOG is that we do know the long term effects, rare as they are of seasonal influenza vaccine but to add another antigen, of which we do not have the results of long term study, is , in my opinion unreasonable.
Long term neurological disorders cannot be evaluated after only one year ( 2009 vaccine) although, I agree are rare.
My point and the point made by AOG is that we do know the long term effects, rare as they are of seasonal influenza vaccine but to add another antigen, of which we do not have the results of long term study, is , in my opinion unreasonable.
The following was reported in August 2009.
/// The British Neurological Surveillance Unit (BNSU), part of the British Association of Neurologists, has been asked to monitor closely any cases of GBS as the vaccine is rolled out. ///
/// One senior neurologist said last night: ‘I would not have the swine
flu jab because of the increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) ///
/// The British Neurological Surveillance Unit (BNSU), part of the British Association of Neurologists, has been asked to monitor closely any cases of GBS as the vaccine is rolled out. ///
/// One senior neurologist said last night: ‘I would not have the swine
flu jab because of the increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) ///
