Question removed.

[anotheoldgit]

Yesterday I posted a question regarding a Gang of Asian men who were jailed for abusing young white girls as young as 12.

http://tinyurl.com/27kl46p

For some reason I notice it has been removed, without any exclamation.

This was a legitimate news story, so why was it removed?

[dotty.]

perhaps there is a misguided 'western' theory that asian men consider a girl of 12 not to be a child? Just a thought, in England it was legal to marry at 12 (girls) 14 (boys) into the 1920s though.

[NazNomad]

...and Wales in the 1990's

[boxtops]

Here here, jambo.

[anotheoldgit]

NazNomad

/// Removed, yet you feel it necessary to drag it all up again? ///

You don't stifle me that easy, many have tried.

If thought that these crimes didn't need debating I wouldn't have gone to the trouble of posting in the first place. But this has only highlighted what I have maintained for a long time.

In this country one can debated on most subjects, but one must always shy away from any criticism whatsoever of certain minority groups.

This is fact, listen to any politician, listen to any news report, read any newspaper etc, why it is only recently that we have felt free to discuss immigration, but only then those immigrants from Eastern Europe.

[boxtops]

Nobody's looking to stifly you AOG, IMO we answered it and discussed it yesterday.

[anotheoldgit]

I don't care at what age Asian men consider a child to be an adult.

And I think it is disgusting that some on here try to make excuses for these paedophiles, just because they are not white.

[anotheoldgit]

boxtops

/// Nobody's looking to stifly you ///

Well someone is, why else was it removed?

[sandyRoe]

As I said in my original post both the young man and the girls were victims. The youths had drifted away from their Islamic faith to such a degree that they were drinking and smoking drugs, while the girls probably never had any grounding in the Christian faith.

[boxtops]

Fair point AOG, but the post was around for quite a while - it may not have been the story itself that someone objected to, more like the way that the conversation was going.

[dotty.]

not 100% sure whether that reply about asian men and ages of girls is ained at me but i certainly wasn't making excuses for the criminals, they live here they fit in and ahould live by the law of the land, what i was getting at is in their minds it was probably not a paedophile crime, they needed to be told different,

[NazNomad]

Not trying to stifle anyone.

The Editor has seen fit to remove your post, and you're narrow-minded enough to repost the same thing the very next day?

Like I said, learn from it.

[anotheoldgit]

NazNomad

Don't worry I have learnt from it, in fact I have learnt very much from it.

But methinks they are not the things you almost demand me to learn.

[NazNomad]

Using the word 'methinks' does not imply that you in fact have.

[boxtops]

Methinks is a good word naz, I use it often. A good word for pondering.

[Dris]

and back to my original post..................

[jno]

I was the one who said paedophilia probably had nothing to do with it, and I stand by that. Paedophilia involves children - that is, below the age of puberty. The average for this is now 11, so it's unlikely (though not impossible) that children were concerned here.

This isn't the same as the age of consent, obviously.

[Gromit]

I didn't see the question or your posts, but you have a habit of spoiling perfectly valid questions by using phrases with racist connotations. On many an occasion you use the word 'savages' to describe criminals who are black. If you did the same on the banned thread, then I could see why it might get reported.

There have been some new moderators appointed recently, maybe one of those pressed the zap button.

[fredpuli47]

Quite agree AOG. Those goddam coloreds shouldn't go messing with our white women, ya hear? (That's our job)

You do give the unfortunate impression of singling out crimes committed by those of one religion or one racial group as though you think people of that category are especially evil, more evil than any of your (or 'our' people). Mind, that may be a false impression but,if so, you might consider rectifying it.

[anotheoldgit]

jno

In my search to prove you wrong regarding your reluctance to admit they are paedophiles, I came across the following link.

http://tinyurl.com/32q6bne

The situation is very much worse than I first envisaged.

[Authentic]

I knew it would be removed, that's why I never posted. There are too many narrow minds on here with the power to censor!