Paedos+Rapists Freed To Re-Offend.

[eyethenkyew]

This wouldn't happen were capital punishment in place - so why not re-introduce it to protect innocent members of society?

Bleeding hearts need not bother responding!

http://www.express.co...freed-to-strike-again

[ummmm]

Do you want to dictate what we say?

It'll save many posts I'm sure...

[jackthehat]

Ahhhh.........the still, small voice of reason posts another gentle thread.........

[jake-the-peg]

//Bleeding hearts need not bother responding.//

Is that a mature way of sticking your fingers in your ears and saying "Nah Nah I can't hear you!"?

[jno]

'people who disagree with me need not bother responding'

Why don't you just do this on Facebook and block anyone you don't like?

[Davethedog]

Thats fine by me on the understanding that you are hung on the first miscarriage of justice.

Thats just ensure that no innocent person is hung. Everytime that it happens one of those who state that capital punishment is the right soloution, is hung it will be fine.

[Zeuhl]

When capital punishment was <<in place>> was it applied in UK for sexually assaulting children or rape? Murder - yes. Treason - yes <<Paedos+Rapists>> ???

So <<reintroducing it>> won't make any difference to <<paedos + rapists>> will it?

If you are going to post questions you might at least apply enough effort and summon up all the brain power at your disposal for them to make rudimentary sense.
.

[eyethenkyew]

So much for my plea that bleeding hearts need not bother? Not one sensible reply - just the usual invertebrates more interested in the rights of perpetrators than those of victims(do the latter have any rights in our soft soap society??? Nope, I reckon not, going by this bunch of scum supporters).

Victims - yer on yer own; Scum - yer fans are on here in force.

[Andyvon]

One in five rape allegations are later admitted to be false and malicious. Capital punishment has never been a deterrant anyway. Everyone committing a crime thinks they have planned the thing well enough that they will be the ones to get away with it and not be caught. No one robs a bank or burgles and house if there's a police car sitting outside! That's why crooks have getaway cars.

With regards to paedophiles who are you talking about? It's a fact that one in ten children have been sexually abused by the time they are 16. It's also a fact that 95% of that abuse takes place in the child's own bedroom and home! I have spent several years doing volutary work arranging day trips and social events at a local day centre with over 200 clients. Many of the clients were sexually abused as children and society is now picking up the pieces now they are adults. I have never met anyone who was abused by a stranger - it was always at home by their parents or closest friends and relatives. Who would you shoot/gas/hang/inject? All those peoples' parents and relatives?

[Answerprancer]

You got NOTHING BUT sensible answers totally befitting of your dogmatic, hate-filled fascisistic rubbish ........IMHO.

[NazNomad]

So, anyone that doesn't kiss your arse is scum, duckboy?

[New Judge]

OK, I’ll try to be sensible.

As I’ve said many, many times before on AB (because, strangely, this issue often arises) your question is not worth asking and any answers you receive, sensible or otherwise, are not worth reading. And here’s why:

Even if every member of the electorate, all the MPs, all the Ministers and all members of the House of Lords wished it, capital punishment could not be reintroduced in the UK. This is because it is contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and our own Human Rights Act (HRA) of 1998.

We could repeal the HRA. Prior to the General Election the Conservatives suggested they might do so and replace it with a “Bill of Rights”, but have subsequently decided, since forming a Coalition government, that they have more pressing matters to deal with. However, this would have little effect because we would still be bound by the ECHR.

We could withdraw from the ECHR. However, being a signatory is a prerequisite to being a member of the Council of Europe and such membership is, in turn, a condition of EU membership.

We could withdraw from the EU but the likelihood of that is slim to say the least.

It is most unlikely that there is any widespread support in the UK for the reintroduction of the death penalty anyway, but this is just one example demonstrating why the UK is no longer in charge of its own affairs and will never be so whilst its membership of the EU is maintained. In short, this issue, among many, many others, is not up for debate here in the UK.

How does that grab you for sensible?

[mike11111]

I'm beginning to warm to the idea of capital punsihment if it means leaving the EU as a result!

[eyethenkyew]

At last! A credible reply - thank you mike11111

[sandyRoe]

All prisoners, unless they're lifers, will eventually be released and free to do again whatever got them into jail in the first place.
If the inadequate attempts to rehabilitate them were taken more seriously it might not be such a problem.

[Zeuhl]

<<At last! A credible reply - thank you mike11111 >>

Translation: credible = one that seems to agree with me

even when too daft to spot the 'tongue in cheek'

unbelievable! but quite funny!
.

[Answerprancer]

<<At last! A credible reply - thank you mike11111 >>

Translation: credible = phew thanks for saying that Mike - otherwise I'd have been stumped.