Donate SIGN UP

Sir Winstons Statue Defaced

Avatar Image
R1Geezer | 09:09 Fri 10th Dec 2010 | News
54 Answers
Do these little thugs not realise that it is because of the activiies of people like Sir Winston that they are free to vandilise his statue?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 54rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I too was furious to see this picture, alongside the one of the girl swinging from the flag on the Cenotaph.

http://www.dailymail....hugs-broke-taboo.html

Shocking, and as i said in the previous thread, should have been shot.
As I said in an earlier thread, the ironic thing about the student protestors is that the majority are too f u cking stupid to warrant a university place in the first place.
-- answer removed --
Both acts were disgusting - I had never seen the one of the girl on the cenotaph until now - that one particularly offends me. If she were my daughter, I would not exactly be proud....
No, Geezer, they don't. I agree with flip flop.
The one which really upsets me the most? The police horse- attacking a defenceless animal? How low can you get?

Vibra- expansion not going well, i can't log into it. Get as far as the loading screen and it crashes (apologies R1)
B00, I hadn't seen those pictures before. I'm speechless at the sheer mindless barbarity of it all!! What sort of people are these?
Our future Naomi- scary innit?
I suspect most of the real hard-core activists are not students at all, just people who like causing aggro.
Yes, B00, it is!!
Tend to agree Salla, as i've watched the news footage, and one of them was attacking a window (at the treasury?) with what looked like (now forgive me, don't know it's proper name) but one of those huge spiked balls things on a chain? What kind of uni student has one of those lieing about their digs surrounded by empty Pot Noodle cups?
Just back from breakfast in the cafe..........had quite a time trying to explain what defacing the statue of Winston Churchill and the outrageous attack on the car of the heir to the throne of the UK and his wife was to do with the increase i student loans.

Not easy.

salla

<<< suspect most of the real hard-core activists are not students at all, just people who like causing aggro.<<<

mmmmm! not so sure.I saw the students from Manchester interviewed before getting on the bus to London and they were well "armed" with missiles.
"Do these little thugs not realise that it is because of the activiies of people like Sir Winston that they are free to vandilise his statue?"

So, er, what exactly? What would the reverse be - if he'd thought people might someday deface his statue he'd have decided not to fight the Nazis? He chose to fight for freedom; these protesters are choosing to exercise it. If you deny them that freedom, then was Churchill wasting his time after all?

If the police feel the need to arrest someone for peeing against a piece of concrete, I suppose they'd better go ahead. They might argue, as some have on AB threads about Nick Clegg, that all politicians are corrupt and deserve no better. Either way, It's not something I'm going to work myself into a lather about.
jno.....quite right ???
Not often i disagree with you jno, but I am now ;-)

The violent element of the protesters, and no, im not naive enough to think they were actually students, should have been shot.
jno....I quite understand you not getting worked up ........although I agree with BOO, except I dont believe that it was all due to non student activists..............but tell me, what is the point of defacing ANYTHING.
jno - you'd think that the students would have a modicum of respect for the man who led the fight for our freedom. I don't suppose he thought that the freedom(s) he was fighting for included the vulgar act of urinating in public.
I don't know if they were students or not, B00, I can't tell.

Still, it was a serious question: what would Churchill have said if he'd been looking down:

"I don't like it but I fought for their right to do it"

or:

"I agree with Hitler, anyone defiling statues should be locked up"?


My guess is the former. At any rate, it's my response. Anyone doing actual damage, like kicking in windows, should be duly charged. But being disrepectful shouldn't be a crime (I'm okay with people being furious about it, though).
Dunno about anyone else jno, but If there was a statue of me (hey, i like that idea!) and I saw someone peeing on it, i'd be seriously bloody miffed!
"jno - you'd think that the students would have a modicum of respect for the man who led the fight for our freedom."

i am not convinced they know, or are aware of that.

1 to 20 of 54rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Sir Winstons Statue Defaced

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.