Jobs & Education0 min ago
Gay couple in B&B
I see that the gay couple who were refused a double room in a B&B have won their case and been awarded £1800 damages. I'm not sure of the background facts, so can't really comment, but the hoteliers were found to have acted unlawfully. Does anyone know which law they actually broke and what the damaged were in respect of?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AKMild. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.They broke the law of this land and that's the end of it.
However they should avoid booking a B&B in these countries..Some of which have the death penalty as "punishment" , not an £1800 reward.
"The "F" denotes it's legal to be a lesbian but not a gay male.
ALGERIA
ANGOLA
BOTSWANA
BURUNDI
EGYPT
LIBYA
MOROCCO
SUDAN
TUNISIA
NAMIBIA
GAMBIA
GUINEA
MAURITANIA
SENEGAL
TOGO
SAO TOME & PRINCIPE
COMOROS
DJIBOUTI
ERITREA
ETHIOPIA
MOZAMBIQUE
SOMALIA
UGANDA
TANZANIA
LIBERIA
SIERRA LEONE(F)
LESOTHO(F)
SWAZILAND(F)
GHANA(F)
NIGERIA(F)
KENYA(F)
MALAWI(F)
MAURITIUS(F)
SEYCHELLES(F)
ZIMBABWE(F)
ZAMBIA(F)
CARRIBEAN ISLANDS:
ANTIGUA & BARBUDA
BARBADOS
DOMINICA
ST VINCENT & GRENADINES
TRINIDAD & TOBAGO
GRANADA(F)
JAMAICA(F)
SAINT KITTS & NEVIS(F)
SAINT LUCIA(F)
MIDDLE EAST:
KUWAIT
LEBANON
OMAN
QATAR
SAUDI ARABIAI
SYRIA
UNITED ARAB EMIRATE
IRAN
YEMEN
BAHRAIN
PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES(GAZA) (F)
ASIA/PACIFIC:
AFGHANISTAN
BANGLADESH
BHUTAN
MALDIVES
PAKISTAN
SRI LANKA
PAPAU NEW GUINEA
SOLOMON ISLANDS
BRUNEI
BURMA
MALAYSIA
WESTERN SAMOA
UZBEKISTAN
KIRIBATI(F)
NAURU(F)
PALAU(F)
COOK ISLANDS(F)
TONGA(F)
TURKMENISTAN(F)
TUVALU(F)
SINGAPORE(F)
SOUTH AMERICA:
GUYANA(F)
CENTRAL AMERICA:
BELIZE(F)
However they should avoid booking a B&B in these countries..Some of which have the death penalty as "punishment" , not an £1800 reward.
"The "F" denotes it's legal to be a lesbian but not a gay male.
ALGERIA
ANGOLA
BOTSWANA
BURUNDI
EGYPT
LIBYA
MOROCCO
SUDAN
TUNISIA
NAMIBIA
GAMBIA
GUINEA
MAURITANIA
SENEGAL
TOGO
SAO TOME & PRINCIPE
COMOROS
DJIBOUTI
ERITREA
ETHIOPIA
MOZAMBIQUE
SOMALIA
UGANDA
TANZANIA
LIBERIA
SIERRA LEONE(F)
LESOTHO(F)
SWAZILAND(F)
GHANA(F)
NIGERIA(F)
KENYA(F)
MALAWI(F)
MAURITIUS(F)
SEYCHELLES(F)
ZIMBABWE(F)
ZAMBIA(F)
CARRIBEAN ISLANDS:
ANTIGUA & BARBUDA
BARBADOS
DOMINICA
ST VINCENT & GRENADINES
TRINIDAD & TOBAGO
GRANADA(F)
JAMAICA(F)
SAINT KITTS & NEVIS(F)
SAINT LUCIA(F)
MIDDLE EAST:
KUWAIT
LEBANON
OMAN
QATAR
SAUDI ARABIAI
SYRIA
UNITED ARAB EMIRATE
IRAN
YEMEN
BAHRAIN
PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES(GAZA) (F)
ASIA/PACIFIC:
AFGHANISTAN
BANGLADESH
BHUTAN
MALDIVES
PAKISTAN
SRI LANKA
PAPAU NEW GUINEA
SOLOMON ISLANDS
BRUNEI
BURMA
MALAYSIA
WESTERN SAMOA
UZBEKISTAN
KIRIBATI(F)
NAURU(F)
PALAU(F)
COOK ISLANDS(F)
TONGA(F)
TURKMENISTAN(F)
TUVALU(F)
SINGAPORE(F)
SOUTH AMERICA:
GUYANA(F)
CENTRAL AMERICA:
BELIZE(F)
Oh, goodness me, the attitudes expressed on here by the invertebrates may just be reminiscent of Mr Mosley and his Black Shirts in the 1930s, if any can remember them? I certainly can't, but I can hear the jackboots of those self same apologistic invertebrates coming up the street outside - dozens of 'em! At least!
They'll all be denying the Holocaust next.
They'll all be denying the Holocaust next.
ETY:
"attitudes expressed on here by the invertebrates may just be reminiscent of Mr Mosley and his Black Shirts in the 1930s, "
People have outlined exactly what they think is wrong with what you're saying. You've not resonded at all - you've just ranted and raved some more. So people take the p1ss because it's actually kinda funny. Like Sp, I'm genuinely unsure if you're for real or not because on other topics you've written some fairly level-headed posts.
Your comment on fascism is ridiculous.
"attitudes expressed on here by the invertebrates may just be reminiscent of Mr Mosley and his Black Shirts in the 1930s, "
People have outlined exactly what they think is wrong with what you're saying. You've not resonded at all - you've just ranted and raved some more. So people take the p1ss because it's actually kinda funny. Like Sp, I'm genuinely unsure if you're for real or not because on other topics you've written some fairly level-headed posts.
Your comment on fascism is ridiculous.
I understand the sentaments of the gay couple wanting to stay in a hotel. That in itself is fairplay.
However Stonewall targeted this elderly couple and (probably?) bankrolled the gay couple. If not then they set it up. This gay couple didn't just happen by chance to want to stay there. They didn't by chance take them to court. This doesn't make it fare in my eyes.
If stonewall or any organisation does this it always leaves a sour taste.
The police are in a lot of cases, repremanded for entrapement. What about this couple? They were spacificly targeted.
Not fair
However Stonewall targeted this elderly couple and (probably?) bankrolled the gay couple. If not then they set it up. This gay couple didn't just happen by chance to want to stay there. They didn't by chance take them to court. This doesn't make it fare in my eyes.
If stonewall or any organisation does this it always leaves a sour taste.
The police are in a lot of cases, repremanded for entrapement. What about this couple? They were spacificly targeted.
Not fair
The real tragedy of all this is that an elderly couple were deliberately targeted and "stung" by this pair of unnatural activists who, with the alleged assistance of their organisation, Stonewall, sought them out with a view to exposing their long established policy of catering for properly married couples only.
They clearly had this despicable agenda in mind when they singled out this tiny B+B, made their booking by phone, then threw their wrists in the air in mock horror when informed of the marital policy on arrival. How did they find out about it (or, more to the point, deliberately pick it) in the first place? Online of course, and the website states its marital policy clearly. Why not pick somewhere else then? Sheer vindictiveness, of course.
Hope they feel smug about having ruined not only the little B+B business of this elderly couple, but also their lives. No doubt they feel it was all worth it. Despicable way to treat a pair of God fearing OAPs.
I've yet to see any sympathy for the OAPs from the vast amount of posters on here who are being far too busy hiding behind self righteous proclamations to the effect ("Oooohhhh, but they broke the law, so they deserve to be punished") etc etc.
Better stand by for the crashing sound of slipping halos?
They clearly had this despicable agenda in mind when they singled out this tiny B+B, made their booking by phone, then threw their wrists in the air in mock horror when informed of the marital policy on arrival. How did they find out about it (or, more to the point, deliberately pick it) in the first place? Online of course, and the website states its marital policy clearly. Why not pick somewhere else then? Sheer vindictiveness, of course.
Hope they feel smug about having ruined not only the little B+B business of this elderly couple, but also their lives. No doubt they feel it was all worth it. Despicable way to treat a pair of God fearing OAPs.
I've yet to see any sympathy for the OAPs from the vast amount of posters on here who are being far too busy hiding behind self righteous proclamations to the effect ("Oooohhhh, but they broke the law, so they deserve to be punished") etc etc.
Better stand by for the crashing sound of slipping halos?
-- answer removed --