Animals & Nature2 mins ago
Civil partnerships for heterosexual couples
Sorry, can only find old news link
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-11625835
A couple local to us are fighting their case this week for civil partnerships to be made legal for hetero couples. As it stands CPs are only recognised for same sex couples.
Have they got a case? or not really because they could get married. Are CPs a good compromise for people who want to commit but not neccessarily do the whole married thing?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-11625835
A couple local to us are fighting their case this week for civil partnerships to be made legal for hetero couples. As it stands CPs are only recognised for same sex couples.
Have they got a case? or not really because they could get married. Are CPs a good compromise for people who want to commit but not neccessarily do the whole married thing?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Booldawg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I hate ceremonies of all kinds and we have never married athough been together for 30 + years.We do not get the same financial rights as a married couple re pensions and so on,and if it was just signing a form or doing it online I probably would.I hate the whole 'man and wife' and vows nonsense and I doubt if there is much difference between Civil Partnership and marriage ceremonies. It should all be equal though.gay or straight.
-- answer removed --
what i do think is there should be some sort of equality in law between civilly partnered (did I just invent a new phrase?), married, and couples who have other cohabitant partnerships, friends, mums and adult children etcet. I remember Nigel Hawthorn talking about the fact that his long term partner wouldn't be dealt with under the same inheritance law. cohabiting friends or children should be able to register their partnership to protect financial and legal interests and to be able to be treated as next of kin even if they aren't.
no, neither was my registry office wedding. no vows, very little ceremony, in and out as quickly as possible which suited us. if we could have nipped out and had it done in our lunch break, we would have done. big sister had the full white, ceremonial RAF wedding in church 6 months earlier. she divorced 19 years later, we've been married for 35 happy years.
We don't mind signing certificates,it's the speech,or words you have to say in front of everyone that I'd hatei.e the ceremony.Imagine if you had to say thinks like that every time you signed things,e.g in the bank..'I call upon these persons present to witness I'm taking out £20 from my current account..it would be embarrassing..lol
About one or two sentences each in front of a Registrar and two other people. Hardly embarassing or difficult it is. I don't even remember doing it and it was over quickly. I had to say more at the solicitors recently when I had to declare an oath!!
You don't have to have guests at the ceremony or afterwards. About 10 minutes in your life to have some legal recognition. Not really much is is Ganesh ?
You don't have to have guests at the ceremony or afterwards. About 10 minutes in your life to have some legal recognition. Not really much is is Ganesh ?