Other Sports0 min ago
Britain a laughing stock?
Why does Britain insist in punching above our weight in the world when it comes to military matters? Our fiascos in Libya recently show poorly co-ordinated plans. We are now a laughing stock!
We have had the Chilcot inquiry to insure that lessons are learnt. But will the politicians take note of the past failings?
Are we living on past glories?
Are the politicians not up to scratch?
Is it a diversion from the failed economy?
Should our defence expenditure match our ability to influence world events?
We have had the Chilcot inquiry to insure that lessons are learnt. But will the politicians take note of the past failings?
Are we living on past glories?
Are the politicians not up to scratch?
Is it a diversion from the failed economy?
Should our defence expenditure match our ability to influence world events?
Answers
1 to 18 of 18
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by rov1100. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
No-one can seriously try and defend either William Hague's handling of this incident, or the backlash that will result from it.
I believe Mr Hague to be a man of honour, and i hope he will hold up his hands in the House, and admit that he and his office got this badly wrong.
As experienced army personal have advised through the media, the best way to approach a revolutionary army in a lawless area like Lybia is to approach trusted commanders on the ground, and negotiate a cladestine meeting. Arriving by helecoper is hardly in the spirit of secrecy, and arriving unannounced with arms is likely to result n a response of the 'shoot first, ask questions afterwards ...' variety.
Quite how Mr Hague would feel if the rebels had parachuted into Whitehall for a chinwag about things is a conversation no doubt being conduted behind closed doors as I write ...
I believe Mr Hague to be a man of honour, and i hope he will hold up his hands in the House, and admit that he and his office got this badly wrong.
As experienced army personal have advised through the media, the best way to approach a revolutionary army in a lawless area like Lybia is to approach trusted commanders on the ground, and negotiate a cladestine meeting. Arriving by helecoper is hardly in the spirit of secrecy, and arriving unannounced with arms is likely to result n a response of the 'shoot first, ask questions afterwards ...' variety.
Quite how Mr Hague would feel if the rebels had parachuted into Whitehall for a chinwag about things is a conversation no doubt being conduted behind closed doors as I write ...
Laughing stock? I don't think so. Punching above our weight? I don't think so either. Our special forces are probably the best in the world, though on this occasion they were there to escort a clandestine diplomatic approach to the Libyan dissidents. No doubt they could have resisted capture and escaped in the the same helicopter but that would have meant killing. It's easy selling our country short.....where's your patiotism?
-- answer removed --
McMouse - it is acknowledged that in some areas we are definitely punching about our weight -
David Cameron talks about establishing a 'no fly zone' over Lybia - tricky, since the Tornadoes we would need to do that are being de-commissioned at the end of April, and we do not have any other suitable aircraft to perform that task.
I'd call that a definition of punching above our weight.
David Cameron talks about establishing a 'no fly zone' over Lybia - tricky, since the Tornadoes we would need to do that are being de-commissioned at the end of April, and we do not have any other suitable aircraft to perform that task.
I'd call that a definition of punching above our weight.
-- answer removed --
Based on military strength the United Kingdom is still the 5th most powerful nation in the World.
So long as we don't take on the USA,China,Russia and India we could have a good go at everybody else.
Plus the fact we could wipe out the World with our nukes if we really got angry :-)
http://www.globalfirepower.com/
So long as we don't take on the USA,China,Russia and India we could have a good go at everybody else.
Plus the fact we could wipe out the World with our nukes if we really got angry :-)
http://www.globalfirepower.com/
Very easy to spout off after the event. With hindsight this is an atrocious miscalculation.
Hague has never appeared to settle into this role, I dont think it suits him at all. Lets not forget though that all ministers, of whatever persuasion, will take advise from senior civil servants so Hague is not totally to blame.
As for a laughing stock, hardly. In fact our forces did exactly the right thing, surrendered and did not kill anyone, which without doubt they could have done. It show that we can be restrained and not Gung ho like the septics.
Hague has never appeared to settle into this role, I dont think it suits him at all. Lets not forget though that all ministers, of whatever persuasion, will take advise from senior civil servants so Hague is not totally to blame.
As for a laughing stock, hardly. In fact our forces did exactly the right thing, surrendered and did not kill anyone, which without doubt they could have done. It show that we can be restrained and not Gung ho like the septics.
-- answer removed --
1 to 18 of 18
