I agree with much of the sentiment Jeza.
My stepdad was a miner of 37 years. His grandfather died in the Gresford Disaster of 1934, where 266 men and boys lost their lives.
When Scargill took the NUM out on strike, my Dad(My siblings and I all called him that) was indifferent. He knew the writing was on the wall in regards to the coal industry. He was never a fan of Scargill though, ever.
In regards to the strike, his philosophy was that if it had been the smaller pits(such as where he worked) alone that were being closed, nothing would have been done by the NUM, it was only because they were closing the large pits that were invariably leaking money form the industry. Dad never once blamed Mrs Thatcher.
During the strike, I commenced my basic training in HM Forces. I sent home every penny I could whilst in training in order to help out at home.
Yet, despite all of the above I never once blamed MT.
I don't vote, never have and never will and I didn't agree with everything that MT did, far from it but in the end she often did what needed to be done.
As I've argued before, if every policy of hers was so bad, why didn't Labour reverse much of what she did? Why did successive Labour PM's seek her advice during their time in office?
In truth, they knew that much of what she did needed to be done, they just couldn't bring themselves to admit it at the cost of losing face with their supporters.
Admired by many, pilloried and reviled too MT took the really difficult decisions when she had to and at the very least had the courage of her convictions to see them through.
In closing, I'm sure that she gained so much respect from HM Forces(that was obviously reciprocated) because she too had been subjected to her own near miss with the IRA and had lost colleagues, yet she stoically continued to lead this country, facing up to terrorism and invaders of Sovereign territory alike.
She was a truly unique woman.