News0 min ago
Helium
I am told that Helium is the only element that leaves the earths atmosphere. Is this true and if so, why?
How is helium gas produced?
How is helium gas produced?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by leigh47. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Lighter gas molecule velocities have a higher average velocity than heavier ones. All gas molecules will leave the earth's atmosphere at a finite rate, but it's (roughly speaking) negligible for nitrogen and heavier things, molecular weight 24, and quite hefty for helium, molecular weight 4.
Helium nuclei and alpha particles are the same thing. Any radioactive substance which undergoes alha decay is spitting out helium nuclei, which quickly pick up a couple of loose electrons and become helium atoms.
Helium nuclei and alpha particles are the same thing. Any radioactive substance which undergoes alha decay is spitting out helium nuclei, which quickly pick up a couple of loose electrons and become helium atoms.
Yes, at least for the time being.
If you look up 'ablation', particularly with regard to what happened to Mars' atmosphere, then you will understand that, if earth lost the protection provided by its internal magnetic field then other gases would start to be lost as well. Mars' atmosphere, at ground level, is as thin as our atmosphere at 10,000 feet - roughly the point where you'd need to weak an oxygen mask.
If you look up 'ablation', particularly with regard to what happened to Mars' atmosphere, then you will understand that, if earth lost the protection provided by its internal magnetic field then other gases would start to be lost as well. Mars' atmosphere, at ground level, is as thin as our atmosphere at 10,000 feet - roughly the point where you'd need to weak an oxygen mask.
Hypognosis, wherever did you get your mis-information from? The escape rate of gases from the upper atmosphere is governed by simple energy equations which do not contain any terms dependent on the earth's magnetic field. Perhaps if we lost the magnetic field for a long time, and the extra incident solar energy heated everything up, that would change the temperature-dependent parts of the equations. But there's no direct connection between the magnetic field strength and the gas escape rates.
@bert_h
I gathered that it is earth's magnetic field which deflects the solar wind and the solar wind is what causes atmospheric ablation. Kinetic-energy based escapes would be a tiny trickle in comparison.
It is hypothesised that Mars' iron core cooled and solidified prematurely, perhaps due to low abundance of radioactive elements. This meant it lost the bulk of its magnetic field and its remaining magnetosphere was not sufficient to protect it from the effect of solar wind.
The roving probes are finding what appear to be sedimentary rock layers, suggesting it once had oceans. We can only assume these all evaporated and were lost to space. A planet no longer amenable to terraforming, sadly.
I gathered that it is earth's magnetic field which deflects the solar wind and the solar wind is what causes atmospheric ablation. Kinetic-energy based escapes would be a tiny trickle in comparison.
It is hypothesised that Mars' iron core cooled and solidified prematurely, perhaps due to low abundance of radioactive elements. This meant it lost the bulk of its magnetic field and its remaining magnetosphere was not sufficient to protect it from the effect of solar wind.
The roving probes are finding what appear to be sedimentary rock layers, suggesting it once had oceans. We can only assume these all evaporated and were lost to space. A planet no longer amenable to terraforming, sadly.
Hmm,
I'm out of my depth by page 2 of this one...
http:// yly-mac .gps.ca ltech.e du/Calt ech/Yun gTalks/ yung_20 11_kiaa _pku/ma r%20ref /Jakosk y_Mars% 20Atmos pheric% 20Loss_ 1994.pd f
whereas this might be more digestible...
http:// en.wiki pedia.o rg/wiki /Atmosp heric_e scape
but I'm sleep-deprived and will have to read that one later.
I can't say for certain what my source of mis-information was at the moment. The '10,000 feet' pressure-altitude thing was probably from Sky at Night, circa 1980s/90s but, thankfully, jomifl was able to correct that, being more up to date.
I'm out of my depth by page 2 of this one...
http://
whereas this might be more digestible...
http://
but I'm sleep-deprived and will have to read that one later.
I can't say for certain what my source of mis-information was at the moment. The '10,000 feet' pressure-altitude thing was probably from Sky at Night, circa 1980s/90s but, thankfully, jomifl was able to correct that, being more up to date.