News2 mins ago
Grooming Of 13 Year Old Girl In Yorkshire
// Ten men have been jailed after a 13-year-old girl from North Yorkshire was sexually exploited by 30 different attackers. //
http://
Just come across this shocking case and a surprised that it has had little publicity compared to the Rochdale and Oxford cases. Have we become immune to these grooming cases, such that they no longer become newsworthy, or is this particular case missing a certain ingredient?
http://
Just come across this shocking case and a surprised that it has had little publicity compared to the Rochdale and Oxford cases. Have we become immune to these grooming cases, such that they no longer become newsworthy, or is this particular case missing a certain ingredient?
Answers
1 to 16 of 16
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It really feels like round every corner is a sexual deviant who is taking advantage of our children. I doubt that it is a new crime but the media make it seem so much widespread.
I just can't comprehend how a guy with a child of their own can do this to another child. What kind of human being are they?
I can't begin to imagine the damage that they have inflicted on this girl mentally and maybe physically. It may be that she went along with what was happening (I was her age once!) but at 13 she is far too young to be able to make a decision such as that she is still a child.
I don't feel that there is a need for national publicity in such cases. We need to know that crimes have been committed but not the smallest details.
I just can't comprehend how a guy with a child of their own can do this to another child. What kind of human being are they?
I can't begin to imagine the damage that they have inflicted on this girl mentally and maybe physically. It may be that she went along with what was happening (I was her age once!) but at 13 she is far too young to be able to make a decision such as that she is still a child.
I don't feel that there is a need for national publicity in such cases. We need to know that crimes have been committed but not the smallest details.
Even supposing that what you say is true there Naomi - I don't think the lack of that element suddenly makes it un-newsworthy.
You may be a little fast off the blocks there Gromit - The Mail is carrying it
http://
And remeber the verdict was delivered yesterday in the Hutton case which will have pushed a number of cases down the agenda
But yes I do suspect that if it were another case of asian men grooming children it would have been higher up
You may be a little fast off the blocks there Gromit - The Mail is carrying it
http://
And remeber the verdict was delivered yesterday in the Hutton case which will have pushed a number of cases down the agenda
But yes I do suspect that if it were another case of asian men grooming children it would have been higher up
Why on earth do newspapers and TV reports give the aggregate sentences of the accused? To say that 10 men were given a total of 34 years' jail is as much use as telling us that the total of the highest temperatures of the eight planets is 230ºC. [I don't know if that's spot on.] I don't expect them to give the sentence for each individual, but they could give the longest and the shortest. I think it is done to make us think, "Oh, 34 years! That's a long time, good, that's what they deserve," before you think, "Oh, that's only just over three years each. How pathetic!"
1 to 16 of 16
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.