Quizzes & Puzzles18 mins ago
Clinton For President?
24 Answers
Hillary that is ...
Hillary Clinton is busy making alliances and working for key Democrats - presumably with an eye to nomination as their Presidential Candidate in 2016.
I was always a vociferous proponent of Hillary - back in 2008 I thought she would make a rather better fist of the Presidency than Obama - nothing I've seen over the last 5 years has changed that view.
The main snag in 2016 could be "the age thing" - she will be (just) 69 when the election is fought - but then Reagan was older than that and completed two terms.
Can she do it? Should she do it?
http:// www.tim esdispa tch.com /news/s tate-re gional/ governm ent-pol itics/h illary- clinton -campai gns-in- va-for- mcaulif fe/arti cle_3ce 113b8-3 8f8-11e 3-96bb- 0019bb3 0f31a.h tml?pho to=0
Hillary Clinton is busy making alliances and working for key Democrats - presumably with an eye to nomination as their Presidential Candidate in 2016.
I was always a vociferous proponent of Hillary - back in 2008 I thought she would make a rather better fist of the Presidency than Obama - nothing I've seen over the last 5 years has changed that view.
The main snag in 2016 could be "the age thing" - she will be (just) 69 when the election is fought - but then Reagan was older than that and completed two terms.
Can she do it? Should she do it?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sunny-dave. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think Americans may have had enough of "minority candidates" for a while (a black man and then a female??). Our own choices have been entirely mainstream since Maggie was defenestrated.
That said, it's a matter of who she'd be up against. Normally, the opposition candidates would be fairly clear by now, but the Republicans still seem to be tearing themselves apart, middle-of-the-road v Tea Party. If she'd faced Mitt Romney she'd have beaten him too.
The Democrats themselves don't seem to have produced a more promising candidate than Hillary yet, so she'd be in with a very good chance of getting the nomination at least.
That said, it's a matter of who she'd be up against. Normally, the opposition candidates would be fairly clear by now, but the Republicans still seem to be tearing themselves apart, middle-of-the-road v Tea Party. If she'd faced Mitt Romney she'd have beaten him too.
The Democrats themselves don't seem to have produced a more promising candidate than Hillary yet, so she'd be in with a very good chance of getting the nomination at least.
I'd like to see her have the opportunity - even for just four years.
Actually some of the most effective US Presidents have been 'one term only' candidates - without the need to be cutting deals for re-election (and often with a majority in both houses for most of their term) they have the freedom to actually move things forward.
Actually some of the most effective US Presidents have been 'one term only' candidates - without the need to be cutting deals for re-election (and often with a majority in both houses for most of their term) they have the freedom to actually move things forward.
true, FredPuli, but the recent trend is for people to get going early. As I recall both George W Bush and Obama had laid out their stalls within a month or two of their party's second election loss. These days a Republican hopeful has a huge job just to persuade his own party to unite behind him (or her, of course).
I think if I were one such, I'd sit this one out and hope that four years later the Republicans would have ended their civil war and the electorate at large would have had enough after three terms of Democratic rule.
I think if I were one such, I'd sit this one out and hope that four years later the Republicans would have ended their civil war and the electorate at large would have had enough after three terms of Democratic rule.
I'd like to see her go for it, I hoped she would get the ticket last time.
Interesting who she would be up against.
I'm not the biggest fan of all the fuss and fanfare of US elections though. I was in New York when they were awaiting a ticket announcement about Sarah Palin, it was something else! I just don't see the need for all the ridiculous amounts of money spent on campaigns.
Interesting who she would be up against.
I'm not the biggest fan of all the fuss and fanfare of US elections though. I was in New York when they were awaiting a ticket announcement about Sarah Palin, it was something else! I just don't see the need for all the ridiculous amounts of money spent on campaigns.
I don't think there's much love for Hillary outside of her own party.
She's no Bill: http:// tjg2.fi les.wor dpress. com/201 3/03/bi ll_clin ton_the _lady_k iller_b y_sharp writer- d5wx11h .jpg
She's no Bill: http://