ChatterBank1 min ago
Daily Wail "side Bar Of Shame"
this just popped up on my twitter feed
http://
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mccfluff. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
only after the fuss, I think, hc4361.
Funny Mailwatch site: https:/
The DM Reporter @DMReporter Apr 17
FEMININISM: Women! You're doing make-up all wrong and it's making you look old. Luckily we're sponsored by products that can help. Phew!
Funny Mailwatch site: https:/
The DM Reporter @DMReporter Apr 17
FEMININISM: Women! You're doing make-up all wrong and it's making you look old. Luckily we're sponsored by products that can help. Phew!
"After inviting the reporter to help himself to the soap, toothpaste and hot dog rolls they had spare, the volunteers wished him a Happy Easter and he staggered out of the church with his bags. He later returned the goods."
Read more: http://
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Read more: http://
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
I think that's an unintended consequence, though. They've shown that if you lie through your teeth and invent a plausible back-story, then an over-pressed charity working in hard economic circumstances doesn't really have the time or resources to do the research necessary to establish whether or not you are genuine. Well, obviously. Cutting-edge reporting it is not.
it has, as Gromit pointed out donations have soared; but I imagine that wasn't the effect the Mail intended.
The intended subplot seems to have been that lazy worskhy scum (copyright ToraToraTora) have been stealing food at the taxpayers' expense. Actually, the food bank seems to be run by a charity, not the taxpayer, so they can give food to anyone they want. And the headline said something about the reporters being given food no questions asked when even the story made it clear they had been asked questions (to which they gave lying answers).
The intended subplot seems to have been that lazy worskhy scum (copyright ToraToraTora) have been stealing food at the taxpayers' expense. Actually, the food bank seems to be run by a charity, not the taxpayer, so they can give food to anyone they want. And the headline said something about the reporters being given food no questions asked when even the story made it clear they had been asked questions (to which they gave lying answers).
//The intended subplot seems to have been that lazy worskhy scum (copyright ToraToraTora) have been stealing food at the taxpayers' expense//
I dont recall TTT claiming that people are stealing food at taxpayers expense, nor the DM. That appears to be an extension of your over imagination. But then again, on this site if you are of left wing persuasion the tactic always seems to be to smear your opposition.
What it showed is what I have said before. The claims from the left that food banks are on the increase purely because of poverty is not really true. Undoubtedly some are at beam end, but, as has been shown in otehr reports many aer taking advantage. Including foreigners by the look of it.
I dont recall TTT claiming that people are stealing food at taxpayers expense, nor the DM. That appears to be an extension of your over imagination. But then again, on this site if you are of left wing persuasion the tactic always seems to be to smear your opposition.
What it showed is what I have said before. The claims from the left that food banks are on the increase purely because of poverty is not really true. Undoubtedly some are at beam end, but, as has been shown in otehr reports many aer taking advantage. Including foreigners by the look of it.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.