Technology1 min ago
Well Done This Man, Its Not A Mosque....
Children come to see the animals, not people praying!
And common sense prevailed in this case.
http:// www.nlt imes.nl /2015/1 2/30/no t-a-hou se-of-p rayer-p etting- zoo-own er-defe nds-eje cting-m uslim-f amily/
And common sense prevailed in this case.
http://
Answers
they have no place in the west, have a go in a muslim country with demands you will get sort shrift or a bullet to the head, and yet they want the same things they profess to leave behind for freedom in the west
17:49 Fri 06th May 2016
http:// www.nlt imes.nl /2016/0 2/25/pe tting-z oo-owne r-not-p rosecut ed-for- ejectin g-musli m-famil y/
since one of the conditions for Salah is a ritually clean environment, I'd have thought a petting zoo was a very strange place to start praying....
since one of the conditions for Salah is a ritually clean environment, I'd have thought a petting zoo was a very strange place to start praying....
O-G
This comment came from a U.S. publication which I found whilst looking for a judicial result.
Of course, this is yet another example of Muslims bullying non-Muslims, then suing when they don’t get their way. Islamic prayer has definitive timing, so this family could have easily scheduled their petting zoo trip around their prayer, if it’s really that crucial. However, they chose to be at this particular location during the time of their prayer, most likely intentionally.
The Salam family deliberately brewed the perfect situation for them to scream “bigotry” if anyone objected to their actions, knowing that ignorant non-Muslims like Huub and the justice system would have no clue that Muslims are able to make up missed prayers at a later time if needed.
The five daily prayers are actually flexible, unbeknownst to many non-Muslims. If a Muslim misses one by accident, they must only ask forgiveness and say the prayer as soon as conveniently possible. If they are forced to miss one because of work, school, or other understandable hindrances, they only need to say that prayer when they get a moment to do so.
These Muslims took Huub and the Netherlands for fools, playing on the country’s unconditional tolerance to destroy tolerance of everyone else. Unfortunately, Islam uses freedom and democracy to obliterate freedom and democracy, and it’s only a matter of time before we’ve tolerated our own demise.
Will those “saintly” liberals preaching tolerance for this sort of behavior lose any sleep when Huub van Leijsen loses his business over this debacle? Of course not. They’re too ignorant to recognize the idiocy of their ideals and too self-obsessed to change their point of view.
This comment came from a U.S. publication which I found whilst looking for a judicial result.
Of course, this is yet another example of Muslims bullying non-Muslims, then suing when they don’t get their way. Islamic prayer has definitive timing, so this family could have easily scheduled their petting zoo trip around their prayer, if it’s really that crucial. However, they chose to be at this particular location during the time of their prayer, most likely intentionally.
The Salam family deliberately brewed the perfect situation for them to scream “bigotry” if anyone objected to their actions, knowing that ignorant non-Muslims like Huub and the justice system would have no clue that Muslims are able to make up missed prayers at a later time if needed.
The five daily prayers are actually flexible, unbeknownst to many non-Muslims. If a Muslim misses one by accident, they must only ask forgiveness and say the prayer as soon as conveniently possible. If they are forced to miss one because of work, school, or other understandable hindrances, they only need to say that prayer when they get a moment to do so.
These Muslims took Huub and the Netherlands for fools, playing on the country’s unconditional tolerance to destroy tolerance of everyone else. Unfortunately, Islam uses freedom and democracy to obliterate freedom and democracy, and it’s only a matter of time before we’ve tolerated our own demise.
Will those “saintly” liberals preaching tolerance for this sort of behavior lose any sleep when Huub van Leijsen loses his business over this debacle? Of course not. They’re too ignorant to recognize the idiocy of their ideals and too self-obsessed to change their point of view.
If it is with case or not I don't know but there does seem to be a trickle of these sort of discrimination incidents.
I tend to think that at times there may be a bit of 'planning to make an issue' in advance or at least the 'I am waiting to be offended and will look for it by hook or by crook' attitude.
I tend to think that at times there may be a bit of 'planning to make an issue' in advance or at least the 'I am waiting to be offended and will look for it by hook or by crook' attitude.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.