ChatterBank0 min ago
Why Was The Post Office Chairman (Henry Staunton) Sacked By The Trade Secretary?
After all, he was not working for the Post Office during the Horizon scandal years (only being appointed in December 2022).
Although in her interview on the Laura Kuenssberg TV programme, Kemi Badenoch did not reveal the whole story – there is much speculation that he was sacked because he is still pedalling the lie (within the Post Office) that many of those prosecuted in the Horizon scandal were guilty; and so had to go.
Anyone know if this is actually the case?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Me wanting to keep this scandal in the public eye – Sunak has incorrectly stated that miscarriage victims (of the Horizon scandal) could already receive interim payments of £600,000; this is not so – the offer of £600,000 is in full and final settlement.
I said many moons ago I’d be looking at a minimum of £1,000,000 – many who have lost their livelihood, home and were jailed deserve many times this, but don’t hold your breath expecting them to receive any compensation anytime soon.
I was baffled by this as well. He only got the job in December 2022, years if not decades after the worst of the scandal. It may be that he did or said something really disgraceful in that year-and-a-bit, or maybe Badenoch is just trying to look responsive and proactive and never mind who she sticks the knife into.
there is much speculation that he was sacked because he is still pedalling the lie (within the Post Office) that many of those prosecuted in the Horizon scandal were guilty;
the court of appeal have also raised the issue ( they did it)
so that is reason 1 - and my family has found the. live stream of the oral testimony absolutely compulsive. The issue is - ( bully steven Bradshaw was strong on this) =Horison goes barpy-barpy. and show a non balance of say £1850
and the clerk makes false entries of £1850 to make it balance. And when told this was false accounting, the clerks all ( bar Mr Bates) said 'yes'.
Thing is: was there dishonesty in the false entries? ( no dishonesty then no false accounting contrary to s17 Theft Act).
I think there was an intention to deceive - ( that the balance er balanced when it didnt) - but SOME lawyers say not.
Reason 3 - EVERYONE on the tribunal says - "not me mate, I dont recall and also it was before my time"
and the lawyer after ten mins of cack, says -"can we now have POL triple zero - ....." and the witness of the moment isf ound to have signed a memo " god Horizon is a loadda, cack but we cant say because we wd have to disclose and we cant do THAT".
and when the Head started on the -" well of course minister this is all before my time , and drawing the strands together will take another two years at least..."
she reached into her handbag, drew a pistol and shot him
You know Chieveleys? Blackpool - the very first case ?
The husband owns the site and will not allow the PO technicians to remove the keyboard - and insists that he wont.... until there is negotiation on other matters including the deficits.....
and WE now know they cant get the faulty keyboard and destroy the evidence hem hem....and then swear it is perfect hem hem hem.
and they settle out of court for £187 000
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.