Donate SIGN UP

friends i want u to read the details of a simple experiment given below. please think about it..post ur comments

Avatar Image
dudenexdoor1 | 13:54 Fri 21st Apr 2006 | Science
2 Answers
wel its abt a thing) i guess i
have found. i think there is a way by which u
can disprove (or violate ) the law of conservation(L.C.E)
of energy
by showing potential energy not = kinetic energy. its a
tricKy situation where only law of conservation of momentum is
right OR L.C.E WORKS.wel iv been thinkin abt it for the past 4
years ..i tried tellin this my friends nd they didnot
listen..so i decided 2 start a group.
NOW ILL TEL U HOW.
take a long steel chain (made of oval shaped
links...i.e.. a cylindrical steel rod bent into the form of an oval shaped link.and 1 metre of that chain should weigh 1 k.g )of length
85metres(the longer the better) . take the chain to a platform
of height of say 5 metres. now arrange the chain in such a
way that when u drop one end of the chain down 5
metres ,rest of the chain flows down freely like a stream of
water.(i mean that the chain shouldnot b entangled )
now drop one end of the chain so that it
hits the ground.this whole process is as frictionless as
possible.the chain will start to flow like a stream of water
and it will take a few seconds for the other end to hit
the ground.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by dudenexdoor1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
So how does this violate the LCE??
Like scotstone, I'm, apparently, missing something in your question... your point is?

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Do you know the answer?

friends i want u to read the details of a simple experiment given below. please think about it..post ur comments

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.