ChatterBank1 min ago
Well, what can one say?
15 Answers
Think this journalist has lost the plot?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/colum nists/giles_coren/article5728143.ece
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/colum nists/giles_coren/article5728143.ece
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jules77. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
The answer is, methinks, that Giles Coren labours under feeling he has to distinguish himself from his late father Alan.
Alan Coren could have written this piece wittily and tongue in cheek.Giles Coren's effort is like a very poor imitation of Jonathan Swift being satirical or his father being amusing.
Alan Coren could have written this piece wittily and tongue in cheek.Giles Coren's effort is like a very poor imitation of Jonathan Swift being satirical or his father being amusing.
He has a point though. I am scared walking through parks etc with my 2 kids as all these supposedly nice dogs are let off the lead by their good owners who walk them. Two have jumped up at my son aged 3 to shoulder height, nasty Jack Russells and the owner proudly said '' they are fine, they wouldn't hurt him'' Off she trotted with 3 dogs to carry on terrorising all the other little children.
There is a snobbery now, if you haven't got what is deemed as a Chav dog, your dog is great. Not true.
I have even seen a brilliantly trained working dog Golden Retriever turn nasty and snarl.
There is a snobbery now, if you haven't got what is deemed as a Chav dog, your dog is great. Not true.
I have even seen a brilliantly trained working dog Golden Retriever turn nasty and snarl.
Well first of all, I agree with Mr Veritas.
That was one of the worst pieces of journalism that I've ever read, and tomorrow, I shall probably write to the Times and ask them why they bothered to publish it. It surely got through without the editor noticing?!!
Dogs are, as owners do. You mistreat one, it turns nasty. Very simple really.
That was one of the worst pieces of journalism that I've ever read, and tomorrow, I shall probably write to the Times and ask them why they bothered to publish it. It surely got through without the editor noticing?!!
Dogs are, as owners do. You mistreat one, it turns nasty. Very simple really.
-- answer removed --
I disagree with the article and I can usually see the 'other side' of most arguments.
It is completely OTT and seems to be be confrontational just for the sake of it.
Many people dislike dogs, cats or even children - there are bad in good in each of the groups, but to seek that we eradicate all is a sign of a sad or sick mind.
I appreciate that everybody has the right to a point of view - but without tolerance of the view or opionion of others we will be going down a really slippy and dangerous slope.
Maybe we should eradicate journalists. :-)
It is completely OTT and seems to be be confrontational just for the sake of it.
Many people dislike dogs, cats or even children - there are bad in good in each of the groups, but to seek that we eradicate all is a sign of a sad or sick mind.
I appreciate that everybody has the right to a point of view - but without tolerance of the view or opionion of others we will be going down a really slippy and dangerous slope.
Maybe we should eradicate journalists. :-)