Quizzes & Puzzles48 mins ago
Papal Visit to UK
19 Answers
The RC church is planning a Papal visit to the UK.
It is going to cost the British taxpayers 25 million pounds.
Good value or what?
It is going to cost the British taxpayers 25 million pounds.
Good value or what?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by beso. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I trust that somewhere will be a demonstration reminding him of the Roman Catholic child abuse scandal.
Picture of the Pope in the UK~
http://www.icis.com/b...35ostrich_468x538.jpg
Picture of the Pope in the UK~
http://www.icis.com/b...35ostrich_468x538.jpg
-- answer removed --
the cost of the pope's travels and organising his events will be £15million, which will be shared between the government and the church. the taxpayer will have to pick up the cost of policing including protecting the pontiff from hostile demonstrators.
so i guess, the more protestors,m the more police, the more cost.
its a cruel world.
so i guess, the more protestors,m the more police, the more cost.
its a cruel world.
-- answer removed --
I see Hitchens and Dawkins are investigating whether it's possible to arrest the pope. Appallingly, some of you reading this will be more upset about Dawkins criticising religion than the fact that the Pope provably covered up child abuse. Shame on you.
Isn't it a bit beyond the pale that some people seem to think that because the pope is the head of a religious institution, he shouldn't be held to the same legal and moral accountability for his part in allowing child abuse to continue? If it were Ed Balls, Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, who'd presided over a deliberate policy to move on paedophile teachers and insist this was a matter for his department only, not for the law, does anyone here seriously think he'd be excused in the way Ratzinger has been?
Isn't it a bit beyond the pale that some people seem to think that because the pope is the head of a religious institution, he shouldn't be held to the same legal and moral accountability for his part in allowing child abuse to continue? If it were Ed Balls, Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, who'd presided over a deliberate policy to move on paedophile teachers and insist this was a matter for his department only, not for the law, does anyone here seriously think he'd be excused in the way Ratzinger has been?
Well said Waldo. This will be interesting. Here's a link.
http://www.timesonlin...th/article7094310.ece
http://www.timesonlin...th/article7094310.ece
It turns out that the Times was being somewhat, er, how does one put this diplomatically, erm, generous with la vérité regarding Dawkins arresting the Pope. There are moves afoot, but Dawkins is pretty much incidental.
http://richarddawkins...esOnline,page2#478580
http://richarddawkins...esOnline,page2#478580