Motoring3 mins ago
Speedo vs SatNav - which is more accurate?
20 Answers
If I look at my speedometer and compare it to my satnav, there is a discrepancy in the displayed speeds.
If I'm doing 70 on the speedo, the satnav will be showing somewhere around 63 MPH; at lower speeds the discrepancy is less pronounced - it's not out by a constant MPH, but seemingly by a ratio.
This has been the case in three different cars, all different makes, so either it's a massive coincidence that all my cars have had defective speedos or there is something real at work here.
My instinct is to say that since a Satnav uses relativity to determine position, it's likely to be more accurate than an electronic speedo that relies on vehicle speed sensor picking up magnetic fluctuations from a toothed disk on the transmission.
Should I drive to my speedo or my satnav?
Normally, of course, this isn't a significant issue; I pooter along at 20 MPH regardless of what sort of road I'm on...
If I'm doing 70 on the speedo, the satnav will be showing somewhere around 63 MPH; at lower speeds the discrepancy is less pronounced - it's not out by a constant MPH, but seemingly by a ratio.
This has been the case in three different cars, all different makes, so either it's a massive coincidence that all my cars have had defective speedos or there is something real at work here.
My instinct is to say that since a Satnav uses relativity to determine position, it's likely to be more accurate than an electronic speedo that relies on vehicle speed sensor picking up magnetic fluctuations from a toothed disk on the transmission.
Should I drive to my speedo or my satnav?
Normally, of course, this isn't a significant issue; I pooter along at 20 MPH regardless of what sort of road I'm on...
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by WaldoMcFroog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.i think it is because of the laws for car manufacturers in that the speedo within a car must never understate the the actual speed, so they effectively build in a slight buffer that over states it slightly by around 10% because of the potential for the mechanics/electrics of the speedo in your car to lag over time.
"The indicated speed must not be more than 110 percent of the true speed plus 4 km/h at specified test speeds. For example, at 80 km/h, the indicated speed must be no more than 92 km/h. The standards specify both the limits on accuracy and many of the details of how it should be measured during the approvals process, for example that the test measurements should be made (for most vehicles) at 40, 80 and 120 km/h, and at a particular ambient temperature. There are slight differences between the different standards, for example in the minimum accuracy of the equipment measuring the true speed of the vehicle."
"The indicated speed must not be more than 110 percent of the true speed plus 4 km/h at specified test speeds. For example, at 80 km/h, the indicated speed must be no more than 92 km/h. The standards specify both the limits on accuracy and many of the details of how it should be measured during the approvals process, for example that the test measurements should be made (for most vehicles) at 40, 80 and 120 km/h, and at a particular ambient temperature. There are slight differences between the different standards, for example in the minimum accuracy of the equipment measuring the true speed of the vehicle."
Thanks both, but you appear to be saying the opposite to what I've observed. You both seem to be saying that speedos may not report a speed that is slower than a car is going, yet my speedo reports *slower* than my satnav which Jake confirmed should be more accurate.
Did I misinterpret what you said?
Did I misinterpret what you said?
-- answer removed --
I once owned a 3.4ltr Jag. This model was credited with having the most accurate speedo of any production car. With my speedo showing 70mph, I'd be overtaking those motorists whose speedos were also showing 70, but whose actual speed was around 67mph. I mentioned this recently to a friend who is an Audi mechanic. He said that many Audi speedos are calibrated to show 70 at 68mph. Otherwise, tyre pressure, tyre wear, and tyre size will all affect the accuracy of speedo readings, whereas with GPS these won't matter.
All speedos are accurate to within 1 or 2 mph between 30 - 60mph. Below and above that they become progressively inaccurate due to the mechanical limitations of the speedometer drive on the gearbox. When a speedo says you are travelling at 100mph you are probably doing an actual 86-90mph.
If your speedo says 70mph Waldo then you are probably travelling at an actual 63 -65 mph which your satnav bears out.
If your speedo says 70mph Waldo then you are probably travelling at an actual 63 -65 mph which your satnav bears out.
Errr, rov...
"With a Satnav there is a slight delay between your satnav receiving a signal"
Yes, of course there is, that's how satnavs work, they know the time of the delay and it's used to calculate your position, it's what make them accurate, not what makes them less accurate.
The sat nav will be more accurate than the speedo at a steady speed, it won't respond to changes in speed as fast as a speedo though.
"With a Satnav there is a slight delay between your satnav receiving a signal"
Yes, of course there is, that's how satnavs work, they know the time of the delay and it's used to calculate your position, it's what make them accurate, not what makes them less accurate.
The sat nav will be more accurate than the speedo at a steady speed, it won't respond to changes in speed as fast as a speedo though.
My situation is similar. When I do 33 mph (speedo reading) my satnav reads 30mph. When speedo reads 70, satnav reads 63. All that started when I changed the wheels on my car from 17" to 15". When the 17"were on there were no discrepancies at all between speedo and satnav, readings were exactly the same. Truth be told I don`t really get it why the change of wheels can be a cause of such difference in speed readings.
Hi, My situation is similar. But it has not always been. It all started when I changed my wheels from 17" to 15". When I had 17" ones on my Rover both speedo and satnav read exactly the same speed, all the time, no difference.
However when I put smaller 15" wheels on I started noticing discrepancies between readings: 30mph on satnav when speedo read 33mph. 63 on satnav when 70 on speedo. I cant understand how change of wheels to smaller could`ve caused such difference in readings.
However when I put smaller 15" wheels on I started noticing discrepancies between readings: 30mph on satnav when speedo read 33mph. 63 on satnav when 70 on speedo. I cant understand how change of wheels to smaller could`ve caused such difference in readings.