A judge in Turkey has ordered that a young man accused of murdering two Irish women must give bone marrow samples in order to ascertain his real age. Is this an accurate process?
He claims to be 17 - and hence would be tried as a juvenile - the prosecution want him tried as an adult & therefore facing more severe penalties if convicted.
We've had to send a couple of lads to the dentists to get their actual ages. They came here illegally and claimed to be between 14 - 17 but apparently their ball size and volume puts them both at older... No idea if this is an exact science or not. It's part of their claim for asylm I think.
A simple way would be to look at the ossification centres in the bone and this could be done by conventional X-Rays to a reassuring degree of accuracy.
Bone marrow extraction on a case like this would amount to physical assault.
Just to be a pedant to all the people that said carbon dating (I know it was in jest) but you can only carbon date how long it's been since something died, not how long somethings been alive.
Biological age is not a close guide to chronological age.
Archaeologists tested this quite well 1984-86 at Christ Church Spitalfields, London. The 18th century bodies were excavated from the crypt and were identifiable from records and coffin labels, but forensic work done 'blind' on the basis of tooth condition and bone condition gave widely different results - often for the same person.
Yep, Year 7 is what you would have called year 1 ie first year of secondary school.
The guy in the photo looks about 25 to me, so that would be Year 9 for a new arrival in burnley.....ooh did I write that out loud?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.