Donate SIGN UP

John and Jack

Avatar Image
echokilo | 18:55 Sun 19th Feb 2012 | Genealogy
4 Answers
In researching my tree, I have found lots of Jacks - most of whom were actually Johns ..... why is Jack used as a pet form for John, it's not really shortening it any, and doesn't create a nickname as such ....? TIA
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by echokilo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Because the European (French) version of the name "John" is "Jacques"-- (the Spanish version is "Joaquin" which is similar). This is shortened to "Jock" (which is what a Scotsman would say) or "Jack".
ditto above!

plus, often the dad was john, too, so it was easier to change one name to jack!

cath x
No wonder research is so confusing. The name changes over some censuses have been such a problem sometimes. I find though that on erading the original, you can understand why. They are often transcribed incorrectly. I remember one instance, I though an important ancestor was called Hammish. Absolutely amazed at this, looked at the census itself, to discover it was Hannah
Question Author
Thanks for your answers everyone - and TheOtherHalf this is very true .... I have been caught out lots of times with handwriting, spelling and transcribing issues ................ but it makes it more challenging and interesting (and frustrating!!) I guess x

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Do you know the answer?

John and Jack

Answer Question >>