But, as he says, he has never failed a drug test. He has decided not to fight because the USADA system is 'rigged' - not that they have proved he took drugs himself. Do they have the power to strip him of his titles? I, personally, would like to think he won the tours on merit not drugs.
He says he didn't do it, he was on the radio just now, he says he's tired of continuing to fight when the authorities say he's guilty. If he didn't do it, and this turns out to be unjust, he doesn't have feet of clay. Who should we believe?
Em, they didn't rig the tests he was saying the system was rigged, how awful for him, it makes you wonder if any other athletes who maybe aren't so high profile have been subject to the same treatment.
If Tyler saw the drug and saw him inject how sure was he that it was a banned substance and not something to do with the cancer treatment ? It smacks of sour grapes to me. Surely someone who has had cancer wouldnt put drugs into his body that he didnt need
I think it would be a real shame if he's striped of his titles and I hope they don't have the power to do it. I'm not even that much a fan of the sport but I do recognise he's one of the greats. I don't understand why if the blood tests are all ok, there is any kind of issue.
I am looking forward to the fallout between the governing bodies of cycling. It'll be interesting to see the response from this slight jumping of the gun.
Another sad day for a sport I love! I know he's never been caught, but when so many around him have, yet he was a better cyclist, certainly seems to suggest that he must have been, imo!
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.