ChatterBank0 min ago
Apostrophe With Possessive Plural And Surname Ending With 's'
28 Answers
I have friends whose surname is Davies. They have a black car. What is the correct use of the apostrophe if you substitute my friends' surname for Robinson in the following sentence:
The Robinsons' car is black.
Is it Daviess' which to me looks wrong, Davies' which I believe is correct for Davies in the singular, Davies's or none of the above?
The Robinsons' car is black.
Is it Daviess' which to me looks wrong, Davies' which I believe is correct for Davies in the singular, Davies's or none of the above?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by catmando. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."Keeping up with the Joneses" used to be a commonly-used saying to suggest that people felt they should always be as well off as their neighbours. That is, if THEY get a new car, WE should get a new car. On that basis, one of the Smiths at No 14 might say of the Joneses at No 20, "The Joneses' car is a Jaguar!"
If the family at No 20 were the Davieses, the same would apply, "The Davieses' car is a Jaguar!"
Having said that, if the proliferation of 's' sounds is clumsy, you have the option of avoiding part of the name. For example, in the singular, you can refer to "Jesus' crucifixion" rather than "Jesus's crucifixion". Similarly, in the plural, there is nothing to stop you writing, "The Davies' car is a Jaguar."
If the family at No 20 were the Davieses, the same would apply, "The Davieses' car is a Jaguar!"
Having said that, if the proliferation of 's' sounds is clumsy, you have the option of avoiding part of the name. For example, in the singular, you can refer to "Jesus' crucifixion" rather than "Jesus's crucifixion". Similarly, in the plural, there is nothing to stop you writing, "The Davies' car is a Jaguar."
You would refer to them as the Davieses rather than the Davies, so I see no reason to change that when using the possessive. Therefore it should be the Davieses' car.
However, there is not universal agreement as to the rules for using apostrophes with proper names ending in S. We see St Thomas's/St Thomas', Pythagoras'/Pythagoras's theorem, Jesus's/Jesus'/Jesu's disciples. If you want to avoid being challenged on your apostrophe I would rewrite the sentence so a s to avoid it
However, there is not universal agreement as to the rules for using apostrophes with proper names ending in S. We see St Thomas's/St Thomas', Pythagoras'/Pythagoras's theorem, Jesus's/Jesus'/Jesu's disciples. If you want to avoid being challenged on your apostrophe I would rewrite the sentence so a s to avoid it
"The Robinsons' car is black." This is incorrect to start. You wrote that their surname was Robinson not Robinsons.
Daviess' should look wrong; I believe Davies' would be correct. The family name is singular. Or are you saying you have multiple families called Davies all of whom own a share in the car ?
Daviess' should look wrong; I believe Davies' would be correct. The family name is singular. Or are you saying you have multiple families called Davies all of whom own a share in the car ?
Hi boxtops- I remember as a child puzzling over the use of the word JESU'S in hymns at church
eg http:// www.hym ntime.c om/tch/ htm/s/g /l/sglj peop.ht m
Maybe Jesu is a different person/entity to Jesus.
eg http://
Maybe Jesu is a different person/entity to Jesus.
Old Geezer is wrong in his answer. The family's name is Robinson, so, collectively, they would be referred to as "the Robinsons". You would not say that "the Robinsons's car is black" any more than you would say "ladies's bicycles don't have a crossbar."
Mr and Mrs Davies would be known as the Davieses, so it would be the Davieses' car is black, just like ladies' bicycles.
What authority can boxtops cite for saying that Davies would be one of those names ending in s that would be unchanged in the plural?
Mr and Mrs Davies would be known as the Davieses, so it would be the Davieses' car is black, just like ladies' bicycles.
What authority can boxtops cite for saying that Davies would be one of those names ending in s that would be unchanged in the plural?
depends what you actually call them, and what you'd call their car. Technically you should call them the Davieses but in real life many people would just say "the Davies" becauses saying ziz at the end of a word often sounds clumsy. If you call them the Davieses, it's the Davieses' car. If you call them the Davies, you should be able to call it the Davies' car.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.