I got told off for referring to 'fonts', by someone who used to be in the printing business. They're properly called typefaces but everybody's favourite cultural imperialists, Micro$oft, possibly in an effort to save a few bytes of program code or space on the selector menu, changed it.
I would have expected the list to say that 'Arial' indicates someone who is either a technophobe, or just easy going and happy to accept default program settings, which might extend to other areas of their life. Disinclined to explore hidden features, just taking whatever comes their way.
I like Times New Roman because it is newspapery and relieves the boredom induced by using Arial for everything.
Tacoma is ok, when I can be bothered to spend a few extra seconds selecting it.
I must have wasted one or two hours, over the years, just looking at other typefaces and either thinking 'meh' or "who the heck actually uses one like this?"
Handwriting/script was helpful as reference material, with understanding a few unusual capital letter shapes on old census forms/BMD certificates but I wouldn't have a use for it in terms of drafting on computer and printing it off. It would be quicker to write the thing by hand.