News3 mins ago
Am I Liable For Vets Bill After My Dog Chased And Caught A Cat.
My dog slipped his collar while being walked by my 14 year old daughter, the owner of the cat is demanding I pay the Vets Bill, taking into account this is my brother and his partner (her cat), they are being quite nasty about the whole situation hence the question, he is full of self importance and she is the weeping wounded, the cat is seemingly goin to be fine so they say. I have given them £50 towards bill and have asked for an itemised copy of the bill, not just a copy of the receipt, as the cat is old and has previous medical problems which I am not willing to pay for. This is in Scotland whether that makes a difference.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bacon2017. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The short answer to the question in the title of your post is "Yes".
The more long-winded answer is that you're liable for compensating the owner of 'property' (which includes cats) for any 'damage' (including 'injury') to that 'property' caused by your dog through 'negligence' on your part. i.e. you couldn't be successfully sued if your dog caused damage or injury after a burglar had let it out because you hadn't been 'negligent'. However a court would almost certainly rule that, through failing to tighten your dog's collar sufficiently, it was your 'negligence' which ultimately resulted in 'damage' (= 'injury') to the cat owner's 'property' (= 'the cat').
If you want to 'tough it out' you can see what happens if you simply refuse to pay. In order to force you to do so, the cat owner would first have to send you a formal written demand for payment, stating that court action would follow if you didn't meet the demand. Then, when you didn't pay, they'd need to use the small claims procedure to get a court order against you. (If you still didn't pay then have to go back to court to seek an enforcement order, possibly involving the use of bailiffs).
So you might get away with not paying simply by saying "Tough luck, mate" and hoping that the cat owner won't be prepared to go to court. However you'd be risking ending up having to pay more (through court fees) and possibly damaging your credit score (through having a court order for non-payment of a debt against you). It probably also wouldn't do much to keep the peace within your family.
The more long-winded answer is that you're liable for compensating the owner of 'property' (which includes cats) for any 'damage' (including 'injury') to that 'property' caused by your dog through 'negligence' on your part. i.e. you couldn't be successfully sued if your dog caused damage or injury after a burglar had let it out because you hadn't been 'negligent'. However a court would almost certainly rule that, through failing to tighten your dog's collar sufficiently, it was your 'negligence' which ultimately resulted in 'damage' (= 'injury') to the cat owner's 'property' (= 'the cat').
If you want to 'tough it out' you can see what happens if you simply refuse to pay. In order to force you to do so, the cat owner would first have to send you a formal written demand for payment, stating that court action would follow if you didn't meet the demand. Then, when you didn't pay, they'd need to use the small claims procedure to get a court order against you. (If you still didn't pay then have to go back to court to seek an enforcement order, possibly involving the use of bailiffs).
So you might get away with not paying simply by saying "Tough luck, mate" and hoping that the cat owner won't be prepared to go to court. However you'd be risking ending up having to pay more (through court fees) and possibly damaging your credit score (through having a court order for non-payment of a debt against you). It probably also wouldn't do much to keep the peace within your family.
Thanks for your replies, his attitude is PAY UP or I will get your dogs killed (his words not mine), so you can see why I am hesitant to pay him a penny more until I see an itemised bill, he is the sort to get extras added to the bill that are not required. We do not have baliffs in Scotland to come knocking on the door for money, its not legal here.
You've still got 'diligence' available to unpaid creditors though, Bacon2017:
https:/ /www.st epchang e.org/d ebt-inf o/debt- collect ion/dil igence. aspx
https:/
Animals Act 1971 - or equivalent may still apply
https:/ /www.in brief.c o.uk/an imal-la w/liabi lity-fo r-anima ls/
dog is a not normally dangerous species
scroll down
still liable - damage forseeable and negligence not required
Scotland does make a difference
as you know under the treaty of Union
each act should have a scottish equivalent - which sometimes is different.
short answer - still liable
https:/
dog is a not normally dangerous species
scroll down
still liable - damage forseeable and negligence not required
Scotland does make a difference
as you know under the treaty of Union
each act should have a scottish equivalent - which sometimes is different.
short answer - still liable
BACON there may be no "Bailiffs" at the door but you may have Sheriff Officers demanding money, http:// www.sco tlandde bt.co.u k/artic les/per sonal-d ebt/pow ers-bai liffs-s heriff- officer s-scotl and
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.