its all forgiven though, diversity and all, plus her word against said perpetrator..even if it could be proved nothing would happen, less we have a riot from in the incomers..allah forbid..or sorry god forbid
// To say they can't do anything because he's a refugee seems an extraordinarily foolish dereliction of duty to the citizens of Germany.//
germans not doing their ( perceived ) duty - I doubt that!
more likely that refugee status gives immunity from suit for actions before they entered Germany
clearly refugees are subject to criminal law of the country
( oh perhaps G law doesnt allow prosecution of crimes outside the country. )
and so war crimes - are they indictable if committed outside germany ( like Russia )
Now the sensible question ( hur hur hur I know this is AB ) is whether this occurs in England
that is the Yazidi if she alleged she was a slave in Iraq, is it actionable ? well the modern slavery act 2015 says
//The draft bill included no measures to counter the use of slave labour abroad//
oops so it looks as tho it cd occur here
( burden of proof argument - how do you show it when all the witnesses are abroad?)
Prudie, let absolutely and given free housing benefits etc, local mosque would have welcomed him with praise, jihad benefits and all that await, and where's your x amount of wives we need to bring over.
//more likely that refugee status gives immunity from suit for actions before they entered Germany//
What determines "refugee status" and how? Why, once conferred, should that status give "immunity from suit for actions before they entered Germany?". And why would the German government want even "genuine" refugees in its country if it thought they'd be a danger to its citizens?
I have no idea about refugees and German Law but it will also be based in post war experience and treaty - Large number of ethnic germans were uprooted ( Volga Germans etc ) and booted back to Germany.
// "immunity from suit for actions before they entered Germany?".//
oh come on get real and stop grand standing
most countries dont prosecute crimes that arent committed in the country - for really really obvious reasons - difficulty to prove
England - sexual crimes are an exception
it seems clear the slavery act in England doesnt cover slavery abroad.
as someone said - shrugging their shoulders - the law is the law
Common sense should teach anybody except casuists and shyster lawyers that [former VE neighbour] Jihadi John's and George Orwell's cases are in important ways (not necessarily the same as legal ways) dissimilar.