Quizzes & Puzzles70 mins ago
Bbc News - Protestors Block The A303 Tunnel At Stonehenge.
22 Answers
Can someone explain the logic of this? Even the World Heritage Sites have threatened to remove their backing of the site .... Surely putting a dual carriageway underground for the envisaged couple of miles and the carriage up to the Winterbourne Stoke junction would take emissions away from Stonehenge.
Incomprehensible in my book, not unless they are ploughing through the remains of my grandfather to the fortieth generation, or possibly the hundred and fortieth, Olaf......
Anybody know the raison d'etre for this? Not least tje current road is well south of the rocks.
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-engla nd-wilt shire-5 8024139
Incomprehensible in my book, not unless they are ploughing through the remains of my grandfather to the fortieth generation, or possibly the hundred and fortieth, Olaf......
Anybody know the raison d'etre for this? Not least tje current road is well south of the rocks.
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by DTCwordfan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.This FAQs page, from the protest campaign's website, goes some way to answering your question:
https:/ /stoneh engeall iance.o rg.uk/t op-10-f requent ly-aske d-quest ions/
https:/
The case was decided ( a/c to the beeb - I draw the line at reading planning decisions) on a technicality
he (Grand Shapps) was wrong in LAW not to .... oops
A very early case ( sixties ) where the man from the ministry set aside 2 d for objections which everyone knew were so numerous it would take 4 w (!) - you know I think it was Gordon Walker of smethwick fame - got me to read law at uni. - That case wd have been decided on Wednesbury perversity which is harder now ( and rarer) than appeals on human rights (!!) - proportionality
I thought a tunnel was a good idea
and one of the things the min didnt consider was a tunnel with a dual carriageway (!!!)
he (Grand Shapps) was wrong in LAW not to .... oops
A very early case ( sixties ) where the man from the ministry set aside 2 d for objections which everyone knew were so numerous it would take 4 w (!) - you know I think it was Gordon Walker of smethwick fame - got me to read law at uni. - That case wd have been decided on Wednesbury perversity which is harder now ( and rarer) than appeals on human rights (!!) - proportionality
I thought a tunnel was a good idea
and one of the things the min didnt consider was a tunnel with a dual carriageway (!!!)
as DTC is an educated ABer ( um is that like - postal service or military intelligence? never mind reader, read on !)
raison d'etre - is wrong - it is nt a reason to be(*)
raison de pontsay perhaps - but that doesnt exist in English
ratio - or ratio decidendi ( yeah it really is dessy-dend-DIIIIEEEEEE)Try not to look glary on DIE syllable.)
but blank-minded latino-phobes will be after me if I say that
'on what grounds they have decided' I think is optimal in the circumstances
(*) stonehenge itself ( per se perhaps peutetre) would have a raison d'etre both then ( religious, ) and now ( archeological )
raison d'etre - is wrong - it is nt a reason to be(*)
raison de pontsay perhaps - but that doesnt exist in English
ratio - or ratio decidendi ( yeah it really is dessy-dend-DIIIIEEEEEE)Try not to look glary on DIE syllable.)
but blank-minded latino-phobes will be after me if I say that
'on what grounds they have decided' I think is optimal in the circumstances
(*) stonehenge itself ( per se perhaps peutetre) would have a raison d'etre both then ( religious, ) and now ( archeological )
not sure where you are with that SJ - I've always hated that final 1.5 miles of A303 up the hill from the junction at the bottom of the 'dual carriageway' though if you go right there (coming from the east), then left through the military base and left back onto the Shaftesbury junction on the A303, that can be quite a good diversion around Stonehenge at peak times....
I'm sure I read that in the 1950s it was agreed to dual the road all the way to the S.W.. It's like up here - the A64 has been screaming to be dualled for over 50 years, it's the main E/W route to the coast from Leeds etc.; lots of improvements have been mooted and passed .... and then nothing has happened and they have been quietly dropped. You can follow a long train of traffic, all stuck behind a tractor, for 5 miles.
If the original intent to dual the A303 had been carried out, this would not be an issue. Put not your trust in politicians.
If the original intent to dual the A303 had been carried out, this would not be an issue. Put not your trust in politicians.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.