Hungrywolf, On my own behalf I welcome to answerbank. I hope you find devouring the answers you find here a palatable experience.
With all due respect to seeking an understanding of the rationalisation for the phrase in question isn�t this approach tantamount to requesting a baby to define the meaning of their babbling or asking a madman the reasons for his insanity or a Christian to justify their belief in God? Hopefully, I prove to be none of the above.
Accompanying the improvements in recent times of our understanding of the nature of the world we live in and the physical laws governing its actions provided by the scientific method, the necessity for and possible existence of a supernatural creative entity has for many eroded beyond any justification for belief. Spirituality emerges as a vestigial manifestation of god based religious beliefs, that refuses to disavowal an equally absurd facet of religious ideology, that consciousness can some how be sustained by a mind liberated from the physical constraints of a living functioning brain, a belief that also lent credence to the possibility of the existence of a god in the past.
Spirituality, (religious or otherwise), in its most prevalent manifestations, materialises around a lack of appreciation for and/or a propensity to dispel the crucial and complementary life sustaining processes within a living organism that are required for its survival and well-being, especially with regard to the interconnection between and interdependency of the mind and body. Spiritualists tend to overlook the essential prerequisite for rational thought, a healthy living functioning brain. Is it because the brain rarely manifests its presence that it slips their minds or do they refuse to acknowledge its existence in the hope that by pretending that it is not essential they are somehow excused from using it?
cont . . .