News0 min ago
Roof(s)
22 Answers
Why isn't the plural of roof - rooves?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bbbananas. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.good question. Words are what people think they are, but it's odd that they say roofs but hooves. Still, when in doubt go for the more obviously 'regular' word - and adding an S is the usual way of making a plural, changing an F to a V as well is not. Although mice is the plural of mouse, do you notice how people often say mouses when they mean the computer things?
Good question jno! We all, invariably, pronounce it 'rooves' around here (Cambridgeshire and East Anglia generally).Thinking about it, I would spell it 'roofs' , but the spelling 'rooves' is common here and nobody seems to think it antiquated. Hunting around for examples, I've just found it in an estimate from a roofing contractor.It doesn't strike me as odd, unlike, say, the American 'behooves' for 'behoves' or 'dove' for 'dived'.
Clearly rooves is perfectly acceptable in East Anglia, Fred, and, by the same token, ruifs - pronounced and often spelt reefs - is perfectly acceptable in the north-east of Scotland. (I must confess I never heard reeves there.)
In addition to rooves, the OED also gives roaues, ruvis, roves etc as plurals at one time/place or another. However, among the illustrations of the word in the plural, all bar one later than the Miltonic one I offered earlier is roofs.
The exception? It was from a 1903 edition of Dialect Notes in America; it reads: "Roof n pl rooves a common plural in Massachussetts." It seems the eastern seaboard of the USA chimes well with the eastern seaboard of England and long may such dialectal usages continue. In such circumstances, a jobbing builder is as good a (local) authority as the OED!
In addition to rooves, the OED also gives roaues, ruvis, roves etc as plurals at one time/place or another. However, among the illustrations of the word in the plural, all bar one later than the Miltonic one I offered earlier is roofs.
The exception? It was from a 1903 edition of Dialect Notes in America; it reads: "Roof n pl rooves a common plural in Massachussetts." It seems the eastern seaboard of the USA chimes well with the eastern seaboard of England and long may such dialectal usages continue. In such circumstances, a jobbing builder is as good a (local) authority as the OED!
As panto season approaches, Fred, I wonder how often we'll see Snow-white and the Seven Dwarves advertised.
Definitely a no-no as far as the OED is concerned, though Chambers suggests dwarves is rare, Collins suggests it's either/or and Bloomsbury suggests dwarves as the premier spelling!
Is it any wonder people get confused?
Definitely a no-no as far as the OED is concerned, though Chambers suggests dwarves is rare, Collins suggests it's either/or and Bloomsbury suggests dwarves as the premier spelling!
Is it any wonder people get confused?
Yes QM. And how about the loaves and fishes? There must be other examples. 'Dwarves' is permitted by the Shorter OED [5th edition, 2002] by the way, though 'loafs ', as a plural of 'loaf', is not.
These may be examples of 'correct' spelling following differing pronunciations and spellings of educated people.Nobody that the compilers approved of wrote 'loafs' and none so pronounced it!
These may be examples of 'correct' spelling following differing pronunciations and spellings of educated people.Nobody that the compilers approved of wrote 'loafs' and none so pronounced it!
Loafs is listed as an occasional Scottish plural. I noted that fact because I had started to wonder how I would employ the words "Use your loaf!" if I were addressing more than one person. Perhaps because I'm Scottish, I had decided I'd definitely say "Use your loafs!" and not "Use your loaves!" The latter simply sounds 'wrong' to me. (Yes, I know I could just use the singular form however many people were involved, but what if I didn't want to?)
QM The mystery of 'dwarves' may be solved.It was J R R Tolkien who used 'dwarves' for 'dwarfs' and made the new spelling popular .He'd modelled it on elf/elves. His editor solemnly corrected 'dwarves ' to 'dwarfs' at first.Tolkien's own first choice for the plural was what he called the 'historical' dwerrows or dwarrows [source: The Letters of J.R.R.Tolkien at p 138. No credit claimed. It was a contributor to the American site Answerpool who found this, in response to my enquiry !]
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Just as a matter of interest, the earliest recorded use of dwarves as a plural appeared in an article by W Taylor in Monthly Magazine XLVI published in 1818. The reference reads "The history of Laurin, king of the dwarves." Tolkien may well have popularised it, but he was far from being first to use it.
I think I'll call a halt there...this could go on forever!
I think I'll call a halt there...this could go on forever!