I enjoyed this puzzle, which gave me a decent run for my money. I think that it is rather unfair to criticise the setter for a puzzle that you find too easy or obvious. The setter thinks of a theme, in this case based on a phrase, constructs the grid accordingly, and writes the clues. It is then up to the checkers to decide whether it is suitable for The Listener. So if there is anyone to blame (and I don't think that there is in this case) it would be the checkers, not the setter. Here the grid was well constructed--it was symmetrical (which I consider an important aspect of grid construction, onyl to be abandoned if the theme demands it) and the thematic letters only occurred in clashes (except where unchecked), giving consistency to the theme. The clues were sound and well overcame the difficult challenge of the reduced wordplay. The theme also reminded us that the BRB is more than just a dictionary. The one weakness, in my view, was that you had to conjure the theme up from thinnish air, which was why I was a little disappointed that my favourite linguist (see Wikipedia) was not honoured in the process; doing that would have led solvers more directly, and educatively, to the theme. I find myself, again, agreeing with Stavrolex.