Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Olympic torch carriers cashing in.
26 Answers
The runners are given a souvenir torch, and they seem to be on Ebay for loadsa money.
If this cash isn't going to charity, there's something very wrong.
Are the organisers so stupidly naive, or what?
http:// www.eba y.co.uk ....c0. m14&_so p=16&_s c=1
If this cash isn't going to charity, there's something very wrong.
Are the organisers so stupidly naive, or what?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by venator. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The torch bearers fork out £240 to keep their torch.
If they miss a certain deadline the fee rises to £260 - excluding the stand which costs an extra £40.
The torches were being heavily subsidised and each torch costs £495 to produce.
Any torches that aren't sold will go into the London 2012 Memorabilia Programme and available for the public to purchase.
If they miss a certain deadline the fee rises to £260 - excluding the stand which costs an extra £40.
The torches were being heavily subsidised and each torch costs £495 to produce.
Any torches that aren't sold will go into the London 2012 Memorabilia Programme and available for the public to purchase.
If Id had the honour of being a torchbearer I dont think I would sell it. Im very sentimental about these things. Lots of medals from ancestors could fetch something as would a mint condition cartwheel tuppence but these are treasures to me and so would the torch be. I would pass it down to my ancestors and it would be up to them whether they sold it or not.
-- answer removed --
There's a 1948 torch in the OP link at £8,500, which is nearer the mark. How many 2012 ones are there? The figures given are somehat unrealistic, to put it mildly and would probably be if there were only one.
Yes, I'd sell it. It's the bearer's property, they've bought it: nothing wrong in selling it.
Yes, I'd sell it. It's the bearer's property, they've bought it: nothing wrong in selling it.
All Im saying is that they have had 8000 torches made (in China??) at the taxpayers expense.
They are then selling them at a loss to the bearers.
If the bearers can make a profit of ,say, £1000 on each that's EIGHT MILLION POUNDS.
Why didn't the stupid naive plonkers take the torches back and sell them to the highest bidders for the Olympic charities?
They are then selling them at a loss to the bearers.
If the bearers can make a profit of ,say, £1000 on each that's EIGHT MILLION POUNDS.
Why didn't the stupid naive plonkers take the torches back and sell them to the highest bidders for the Olympic charities?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.