ChatterBank1 min ago
Inquisitor 1255
7 Answers
All filled in, the name of the pseudonym (the longer one) is highlighted and I've got the setter.
But, what I don't understand is: "while the equivalent remnants of the pseudonym of the other must be highlighted in an unclued entry"
Could someone point me in right direction - thanks
But, what I don't understand is: "while the equivalent remnants of the pseudonym of the other must be highlighted in an unclued entry"
Could someone point me in right direction - thanks
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ripper. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The setter's name is the pseudonym, slightly altered, of the longer name.
The shorter name also has a pseudonym - if you alter it (in the same way that everything else has been altered), you will be left with a v short word/couple of letters. This appears in one of the unclued entries - I don't have the paper now, but I think it was in the top left corner.Does this help?
The shorter name also has a pseudonym - if you alter it (in the same way that everything else has been altered), you will be left with a v short word/couple of letters. This appears in one of the unclued entries - I don't have the paper now, but I think it was in the top left corner.Does this help?
Hi Neveracrossword, I have the longer pseudonym's real name starting in the top left hand corner.
The shorter pseudonym I have a three letter word that is the setter, if I then shorten that I have his real initials, is that what I have to highlight? If so they are in a normal (not uncled ) answer, or am I on the wrong track completely?
The shorter pseudonym I have a three letter word that is the setter, if I then shorten that I have his real initials, is that what I have to highlight? If so they are in a normal (not uncled ) answer, or am I on the wrong track completely?