ChatterBank1 min ago
L O L ... The Daily Mail
23 Answers
http:// www.twi rlit.co m/2013/ 01/28/t he-dail y-mail- stays-s uper-cr eepy-wi th-thei r-quest ionable -intere st-in-y oung-ce lebrity -girls/
20 Jan 2013
The Daily Male attacks publications which "sexualise the young".
27 Jan 2013
The Dirty Male describes Heidi Klum's daughter, Leni, as a "leggy beauty".
(Leni is 8 years old!)
28 Jan 2013
The phrase "leggy beauty" is hastily deleted from the Mail's online page.
LOL
20 Jan 2013
The Daily Male attacks publications which "sexualise the young".
27 Jan 2013
The Dirty Male describes Heidi Klum's daughter, Leni, as a "leggy beauty".
(Leni is 8 years old!)
28 Jan 2013
The phrase "leggy beauty" is hastily deleted from the Mail's online page.
LOL
Answers
I'm ready to get shot down here but I don't see the phrase 'leggy beauty' as sexualising her at all.
11:03 Tue 12th Feb 2013
I would like to agree Evian - in theory it shouldn't be a problem - but in today's sex obsessed world I'm afraid it probably isn't quite acceptable.
Remember all the really vile, leering stuff about Emma Watson when she was not even a teenager (not to mention the 'countdown to legality' clock that was posted just before she was 16) - there needs to be a line somewhere and I think 'leggy beauty' at 8 is probably on the wrong side of it?
Remember all the really vile, leering stuff about Emma Watson when she was not even a teenager (not to mention the 'countdown to legality' clock that was posted just before she was 16) - there needs to be a line somewhere and I think 'leggy beauty' at 8 is probably on the wrong side of it?
The DM do love their young celebrity girls. Suri Cruise for instance - 6.5 years old , and the Mail has already run more than 800 stories about her. And they do love young celebrity girls in bikinis, and most especially love stories about young celebrity girls behaving "beyond their years", or "dancing raunchily". They especially love those kind of stories where they can publish photos of young "celebrity" girls in bikinis.
This from a paper that condemns those who leer at young girls. Their obsession was picked up in previous stories, such as this one about Elle Fanning..
http:// www.ano rak.co. uk/3383 91/cele brities /daily- mail-pe rvs-at- 14-year -old-el le-fann ing.htm l/
This from a paper that condemns those who leer at young girls. Their obsession was picked up in previous stories, such as this one about Elle Fanning..
http://
The other curious trait in newspapers is to comment that celebrity daughters have been dressed unsuitably ... suggest that the parents should not be parading their daughters in such a way ...
... and then publish the picture for their millions of readers
(who will obviously not look at the picture, because it's unsuitable)
... and then publish the picture for their millions of readers
(who will obviously not look at the picture, because it's unsuitable)
JJ
The funniest one they did was the 'outrage' at Rihanna's sexualised performance at the final of the X Factor a couple of years ago.
The performance was such a disgrace, what with the number of children watching, that the Mail had to print twelve pictures of her gyrating around in her panties.
...plus, they included a link to a YouTube video of the act.
Lovely.
The funniest one they did was the 'outrage' at Rihanna's sexualised performance at the final of the X Factor a couple of years ago.
The performance was such a disgrace, what with the number of children watching, that the Mail had to print twelve pictures of her gyrating around in her panties.
...plus, they included a link to a YouTube video of the act.
Lovely.