News0 min ago
Could This See An End To The Good Friday Agreement?
18 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.sandyRoe
/// No. Even if the dissidents could mount a 'spectacular' on the UK mainland it wouldn't affect the political process in N Ireland.///
Not quit with you, Wasn't the Good Friday Agreement drawn up to put an end to IRA terrorists attacks?
If that is true, then surely if they stated their actions up all over again, that would see an end to the Good Friday agreement?
/// No. Even if the dissidents could mount a 'spectacular' on the UK mainland it wouldn't affect the political process in N Ireland.///
Not quit with you, Wasn't the Good Friday Agreement drawn up to put an end to IRA terrorists attacks?
If that is true, then surely if they stated their actions up all over again, that would see an end to the Good Friday agreement?
AOG - five minutes spent trawling the net would support fgt's remarks (though after certain comments yesterday when I wasn't online, I am surprised that I am defending her).
There are journals like Jane's Intelligence Review that make for interesting reading and not least in better understanding the situation with all the dissident groups
http:// cain.ul st.ac.u k/issue s/viole nce/par amilita ry2.htm
There are journals like Jane's Intelligence Review that make for interesting reading and not least in better understanding the situation with all the dissident groups
http://
DTCwordfan
/// AOG - five minutes spent trawling the net would support fgt's remarks (though after certain comments yesterday when I wasn't online, I am surprised that I am defending her). ///
Thank you for that DTC, but I wasn't having a go at her, it was just a flippant answer to the rather queer answer that she gave me, more or less to say that she knew of things that she could not plaster all over the internet.
By the way how have you managed to change your username, mine still hasn't been activated?
/// AOG - five minutes spent trawling the net would support fgt's remarks (though after certain comments yesterday when I wasn't online, I am surprised that I am defending her). ///
Thank you for that DTC, but I wasn't having a go at her, it was just a flippant answer to the rather queer answer that she gave me, more or less to say that she knew of things that she could not plaster all over the internet.
By the way how have you managed to change your username, mine still hasn't been activated?
sandyroe is spot on. Sean O'Callaghan is not a person I would put down as having any sort of inside knowledge of dissident republicans. He's basically saying that in his opinion there are a few people of a republican persuasion who would quite like a big bomb or two to mark the centenary of 1916.
Fancy that Sean.
There are even a few people who may seriously be planning that. But it doesn't sound like his ear is exactly close to the ground. More like straws in the wind.
And in the unlikely but awful event that such an atrocity did occur it wouldn't blow the peace accord off course.
Fancy that Sean.
There are even a few people who may seriously be planning that. But it doesn't sound like his ear is exactly close to the ground. More like straws in the wind.
And in the unlikely but awful event that such an atrocity did occur it wouldn't blow the peace accord off course.
Sean O'Callaghan sold out his own ideals so has about as much in common with current republican dissidents as Ian Paisely does. He would know the sum total of jack sh1t3 about anything going down. The truth of the matter is that there are not many people who want a return to the bad old days but plenty who talk a good fight and who like to imply that they have inside knowledge about the next pack of fecking idiots who want to draw attention to themselves and try to stuff things up for people who actually do want peace.
Of course there will be a lot of legitimate attention and interest in the anniversary of the easter rising with all sorts of things to mark it of a legitimate nature, there will also be some lunatics wanting to cause a ruckus, but none of it will derail the peace process, too many big players have invested very heavily in that being a success.
Pretty much anyone could have given that speech, because what he says is so flaming obvious- he knows nothing special.
Of course there will be a lot of legitimate attention and interest in the anniversary of the easter rising with all sorts of things to mark it of a legitimate nature, there will also be some lunatics wanting to cause a ruckus, but none of it will derail the peace process, too many big players have invested very heavily in that being a success.
Pretty much anyone could have given that speech, because what he says is so flaming obvious- he knows nothing special.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.