Donate SIGN UP

Spectator 2115

Avatar Image
djawhufc | 05:52 Thu 30th May 2013 | Crosswords
16 Answers
Hi all

Enjoy this week's crossword.

Misprints in there somewhere.

I'm off to Hay for the book festival. Hopefully it won't all be over my head.

All the best

DJA
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 16 of 16rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by djawhufc. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Hay Ho :-)
Thanks, Daniel! Enjoy the Hay Book Festival!
Cheers Daniel. Enjoy your cultural break!
Thanks Daniel. Another "hard one" today - took a while!
Thanks Daniel & enjoy the festival.

I think getting 2 & 3d very early on made the puzzle reasonably straightforward.
I agree: learned a couple of new words this morning!
And have fun, Daniel!
Hi Roslyn. Are you a winner of the latest Viz crossword by any chance?
Seems to me there are TWO "alternative titles" : the one spelled out by the corrections (7 letters), and the old title, slightly corrected (5 letters). Is it better to mention both?!
Greyfox - I don't know - I only enter because "hallgreening" sends me the pdf puzzle and I usually have a go! What have I won??
Congratulations. Not the £50 first prize alas. You've won a Viz T-shirt "that were once the height of fashion before becoming dated, followed quickly by a brief spell being retro chic and are now once again old hat. Size XL." Just what you've always wanted I'm sure. :-)

Did this issue's crossword for the first time. Not easy is it? It's scatology makes Cyclops in Private Eye tame in comparison.
maurice, I haven't got the right seven letter misprint word yet, but I agree with you that the title is a misprint of an alternative.
Thank you for the confirmation, whatsthat! To be on the safe side I added the 5-letter one in brackets, but I suppose that was just an extra kick!
I've just realized the first correcting letter corrects a wrong one in the title, not in 1a, so it's not actually part of a definition in the usual sense --- or am I overlooking something else?
Evidently not (said he, answering his own q as usual)! Using "definition" to include the title seems a pretty mean trick to me (even if it's happened before)..........................
maurice,
I thought the same over breakfast this morning!
Thank you again for confirmation!

1 to 16 of 16rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Spectator 2115

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.