Donate SIGN UP

No Right Hook From Ed Then?

Avatar Image
youngmafbog | 12:56 Wed 14th Aug 2013 | News
34 Answers
I reckon Prezza's reaction was spot-on, nothing from Ed though.

http://news.sky.com/story/1128517/ed-miliband-is-egged-on-campaign-visit

On a serious note though I think it is pretty disgusting our politicians cannot walk the street without attack.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 34rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It is - but Prescot's reaction was that of a thug, not a politician and minister.

It is wrong that anyone, politician or not, cannot walk any street without fear of attack, but that is the world we live in.

It does underline the intelligence of the political critic - he was wearing a flouresecent jacket, so he was never going to be able to melt into the crowd and walk away!
Side note - you see the flats on the right? I used to live right behind there.

youngmafbog

/// No Right Hook From Ed Then? ///

Blimey I first thought you were referring to me then.
I don't blame Prescot for thumping that twit !
viv - it is easy to understand reactive violence, but that does not condone or excuse it - especially from a government minister.
andy - I still don't blame him!
-- answer removed --
Disgusting.........andy...they are human beings first and Politicians second, left or right of the political scene, they have human failings.......and yes, i would have "thumped" him.
Sqad - they are human beings, no dispute there.

But by the fact that Prescott becomes, through choice, an elected politician and government minister, that means that some of life's little luxuries, like brawling in the street, are no longer an option for him because, due to his status and (considerable) remuneration from the public purse, the public is entitled to expect him to behave with a degree of personal dignity, as well as ensuring he does not flout the common laws of the land which are made and enforced by the government of which he is a senior member.

So if you want to be a incoherent womanising braggart who fights in the street - go ahead, but not on the public's salary in a position as a government minister - it is not accetptable.
At the time, I thought John Prescott had five totally justifiable reasons for thumping the twonk who threw an egg at him...a) he'd assaulted him; b) he had a mullet and 'c' to 'e' I'll keep to myself for fear of being barred!
LOL QM!
Disappointing event

because every egg/pie/flour bomb thrown means another security advisor recommending minimal public engagement without crowd management.

I don't have much time for politicians but I like seeing them walking about rather than just whizzing past in armour plated limos
That's about the only thing prezza ever did that I approved of!
That probably says more about you than about Prescott, Tora.
Throwing eggs is so last year. Now if it had been a small wedge of Wensleydale - that would have been funny ;)


But seriously I do not advocate violence to shut politicians up. Indifference usually works far better.
I approved of Prezza's right hook as well. His attacker was an uneducated oik and deserved all he got. Prezza's reputation wasn't harmed at all, maybe improved. Those that didn't like after his punch were the same people that didn't like him before, so no loss there !

Sadly, Ed isn't Prezza it would seem. Perhaps if he was, he might be a few points higher in the Polls today.
mikey - I really hate to come over as some kind of po-faced humourless twonk here, but do you really think that a government minister assaulting someone in the street is accetpable, and should result in him being better thought of?

That's fine, as long as said minister never ever registers an opinion in public about street violence, assault, etc. because his actions have instantly made any detached and pertinent views - the sort we are entitled to expect from our government - laughable.

That is the reason why his behaviour was unacceptable, and not, as the government at the time said, laughing it off, Oh that's just John ... as though that makes it alright then.

It doesn't.
mikey - if, as you suggest, the premise under which it is OK for an individual to attack another individual in the street is that the assaultee must be, quote, 'an uneducated oik', then the gentleman throwing the egg was perfectly within his rights as well - if your argument is to be accepted.
Andy...you said it first...po-faced is quite appropriate here. Prezza didn't "attack" the oaf, he defended himself. He has nothing to feel bad about whatsoever. Stop being Miss Polly Perfect...anybody who expected Prezza to sit down and have a debate about the matter obviously doesn't know Prezza !
Sqad - if it is right to thump him
then it must be right to egg him ?

the two hims are different people by the way

1 to 20 of 34rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

No Right Hook From Ed Then?

Answer Question >>