News2 mins ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Even the Chancellor has just so much money.... ( = a set finite amount)
If you set aside £38 bn for banks because they are really a good thing
or you chums run them and there is your next job
then you have do without - aircraft carriers - or shipyards
or something else....
so it is inevitable that vulnerable groups get it in the neck in times of retrenchment [ or else by definition they wouldnt be vulnerable - another group would be ]
no money - no food on the table - its is the same for the rosy cheeked chancellor as it is for us.
anyway - I am glad the litigants won a limited victory....but doesnt really change the cr+p we are in as a result of unbridled greed of the bankers of yore.
If you set aside £38 bn for banks because they are really a good thing
or you chums run them and there is your next job
then you have do without - aircraft carriers - or shipyards
or something else....
so it is inevitable that vulnerable groups get it in the neck in times of retrenchment [ or else by definition they wouldnt be vulnerable - another group would be ]
no money - no food on the table - its is the same for the rosy cheeked chancellor as it is for us.
anyway - I am glad the litigants won a limited victory....but doesnt really change the cr+p we are in as a result of unbridled greed of the bankers of yore.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.