Motoring74 mins ago
Listener 4292: Going Out In Style By Homer
47 Answers
That was quite a work-out. I admit to firing up the spreadsheet to help with the sorting, and once I'd got the theme and saw what had to be revealed I left a few loose ends till this morning. Some beautifully hidden misprints and, for me at least, a few red herrings. Thanks, Homer, for a great puzzle and for reminding me of some happy evenings.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AHearer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.A fantastic construction and a real slog to get to the end, just a shame that the finale is (to me anyway) a distinctly unconvincing word/letter search not helped by the vagueness of the 'manipulation' required. I managed to get TAPU but I'll be as hacked off as those that didn't if I find that I have highlighted in the wrong places. Great puzzle Homer, shame about the endgame.
Like many, I imagine, I struggled to fill the grid; it made Radix's recent puzzle seem like a stroll in the park. I felt the setter relied rather too heavily on obscurities buried within Chambers. Obviously there's a role for these in any tough puzzle (and even not so tough), but such widespread use as we have here makes solving a rather tedious chore of trawling through Chambers' nooks and crannies. I prefer tough clues to be so because of verbal subterfuge and dexterity rather than obscure synonyms.
In my naive optimism I thought that once I'd finished the grid and got the theme I'd be home and dry, but I've now found several different versions of the theme, so finding what to highlight looks as though it's not going to be straightforward.
In my naive optimism I thought that once I'd finished the grid and got the theme I'd be home and dry, but I've now found several different versions of the theme, so finding what to highlight looks as though it's not going to be straightforward.
Contendo, I was in a similar position to you. The trouble is that in several cases there are alternative corrections that are justifiable, given the looseness or indirectness of some definitions. In the end I managed to get a meaningful pair of instructions, but only by replacing one of my corrections, that I thought was unquestionable, with another one that doesn't really seem to fit the clue at all.
I'm not sure how to resolve a few ambiguities in the highlighting. Three might be resolved by observing symmetry, but that still some others. Manipulation of the grid doesn't seem to resolve things. Actually, I don't really see how manipulation of the grid enables the letters to appear clearly in sequence anyway.
My initial selection of letters seems to be confirmed when I do the rather fiddly manipulation, though I still have lingering doubts as to whether I'm doing what's intended, but I'm not spending any more time on it.
Cagey, you've probably got some wrong 'corrections'. Check them carefully for other possibilities. You've almost certainly got the wrong correction to 40a. I doubt many solvers went for the correct one first time.
Cagey, you've probably got some wrong 'corrections'. Check them carefully for other possibilities. You've almost certainly got the wrong correction to 40a. I doubt many solvers went for the correct one first time.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.